Talk:El Cielo

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Albums, an attempt at building a useful resource on recordings from a variety of genres. If you would like to participate, visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the quality scale.
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the importance scale.
The article has not been rated for quality and/or importance yet. Please rate the article and then leave comments here to explain the ratings and/or to identify the strengths and weaknesses of the article.

[edit] Referring to motifs

"The painting was unveiled in 1944 and contains references to many of the album's core themes and song titles" This sounds strange: Like Dali is making references to the album (obviously not so). I can't think of how to fix it at the moment... --Daev 06:18, 15 April 2006 (UTC)

Gave it a go, hopefully it sounds a bit better. 164.38.118.188 08:58, 22 April 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Disambiguation

El cielo is listed on Biosphere Reserves in Mexico. Pixeltoo 12:31, 12 September 2006 (UTC)

Are we sure about this Eternal Sunshine thing? Sounds like someone is making really vague connections between the two, the way a conspiracy theorist conjures up evil plots in their ever-rationalizing head. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.29.72.20 (talk • contribs) 16:19, November 24, 2006

Apparantly they aren't vague, considering how much evidence was on the page in support of the connection. I put the section back, because it's better to have the information on this (clearly stated as such) theory, in case someone wants the information, like I did today. And you ^, remember to sign your posts. Mr. Toad 05:57, 7 January 2007 (UTC)

I removed that section per WP:V and WP:OR -- everything on Wikipedia needs to be cited to a reliable source. Here is the link for the text I removed: if you can find a source to prevent this from being OR, feel free to include it, but as it stands now, it's not valid for inclusion. Dylan 12:01, 3 March 2007 (UTC)