User:Ekjon Lok

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Contents

[edit] The best moment in the entire history of Wikipedia:

[1] "to utilise official naming".

[edit] From Talk:Daylight (17 June 2005)

[edit] Letter to you sir

Dear Sir, first all I would tell you my name is Letitia Lele Ngombi, and I for 20 p ast years I have been wife to assistand Director (Jorge pedro manuel jose ngombe ) of the Second development Bank of Africa in Lagos.Recently our Land have receved contribution grants amounting to Total funds of $20,000,000,000,000 that is twenty billion billion billion american(US) dollares. for the purpose of advanced construction of advanced pipeline for the natural resoorses of Nigeria. Recently however my husband and other directors of afformentioned Bank and officials from the Department of land Utilisation and foreign Trade have perished in a ghastly Plane Accident when flying from the Bank Premisses in tobago to Nagoya where the deal would takeplace The plane was a very old ukrainian TU-144 and the crew is to blame for the horrible Crash. The bodies were scatteerd all over the PAsicifc ocean and then have not ever been discovered since. The funds now remain in a frozen fund account at the banque Pia Zadora in Siena italy,where the authorities are not athorized to hand over funds to non-athorized persons. I therfore would like to make ayou aproposition you cannot refuse. The deals is to mutual benefit for all parties conserned so your speedy reply is appresiated. If you let me contact with your BANK NAME AND ACCOUNT NUMBER and name of PERSONin whose name said ACCOUNT is registered we will transfer sum of £221,435,333,1321 that is two thousand s and two billion billion ponds setreiling and so the deal is to your benefit pleas contact us soon your trust is appreciated god speed and long live time cube.

[edit] How POV-pushing on Wikipedia works:

  • Reviewer A:
    If you want to see two-and-a-half-hours of pure unadulterated shit, then go and see this movie. If, however, you value your sanity, keep as far from it as possible.
  • Wikipedia:
    [[Reviewer A]], a notable [[Hollywood]] critic, exhorts: "Go and see this movie!" <cite name="ReviewerA" />
  • Reviewer B:
    Although, very occasionally, the report raises some valid questions, for most part it is filled with unimaginable rubbish; the arguments presented are largely nonsensical, and hardly deserve any serious consideration by researchers in this field.
  • Wikipedia:
    The well-known scientist [[Reviewer B]] states: "The report raises valid questions." <cite name="ReviewerB" />