User talk:Einsidler

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Welcome!

Hello, Einsidler, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome!  -- RHaworth 17:50, 19 June 2006 (UTC)

Contents

[edit] some argue

I have moved Some argue to User:Einsidler/Some argue, mainly under the avoid self-reference rule. It may be accepted in the Wikipedia: namespace. But no-one is ever going to read it unless you create links to it, eg. from Wikipedia talk:Neutral point of view. -- RHaworth 17:50, 19 June 2006 (UTC)

[edit] just curious

I was wondering... how did you notice my uploaded pictures so quickly yesterday? I hadn't even posted them to an article. You were quick! -- Onecandleprovideslight 12:17, 20 June 2006 (UTC)

[edit] TfD nomination of Template:EDinfo

Template:EDinfo has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for Deletion page. Thank you. bogdan 14:30, 7 September 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Links

Regarding ED, please see: Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/MONGO#Links to ED, they are no longer allowed here as they have been posting some rather defamatory harassment articles about several Wikipedians. I have removed a link from your user page and one from The Game (game), thank you.--Konst.ableTalk 05:08, 22 October 2006 (UTC)

  • Not every article on ED is attacking anything. I'll leave the link out of the talk page as I see that even The Game (game) is serious business on wikipedia, but I'm not having links removed from my userbox because of some retard having sand in his vagina about a few articles. kthxbi --Einsidler 06:54, 22 October 2006 (UTC)
    • Is that a personal attack? If so, care to come forward and discuss who you are attacking?--MONGO 06:56, 22 October 2006 (UTC)
      • The fact it only took you 2 minutes to jump on this talk page is very amusing. Basing official site policy on some demented view of a website seems pretty retarded to me. Purhaps it would make sense to actually read the articles being linked to before removing links. Less than half ED has anything offensive to any particular person, and IMO the policy should just apply to those articles. --Einsidler 07:08, 22 October 2006 (UTC)
        • It is obvious that you are an editor at ED...and you state clearly on your userpage that you prefer that website. Since your edits here are not much better than the average troll, I'll give you one hour to remove the links you have posted above, or I will block you in accordance with the above mentioned arbcom decision. Up to you.--MONGO 07:15, 22 October 2006 (UTC)
          • My edits here are mainly minor formatting and gramatical corrections. As I stated somewhere, I am a wikivandal, but do not vandalise Encyclopedia Dramatica or Wikipedia because they are useful sources of information. What I really want is for there to be some kind of peace between the wikis, but as it is clear that is never going to happen, I'll remove the few links I placed to ED and go back to occational formatting corrections. I don't really care that much about wikipedia, its your coolaid, you may as well enjoy it. I'm going to gb2wikia and screw up some articles. --Einsidler 07:24, 22 October 2006 (UTC)

Good to see...what I would prefer is that you instead rethink the reasons why you would edit at ED at all when so much of their website spins vitrolic bigotry and it has become increasingly hard to keep a job when employers have some much access to places you edit, even in your free time...sorry, that stinks, but it is becoming a big deal....things can come back to haunt you in this day and age. Best wishes.--MONGO 07:39, 22 October 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Lol

Hey sexy. --Mudkips 09:00, 31 December 2006 (UTC)

  • So i herd i liek u --Einsidler 12:44, 31 December 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Orphaned fair use image (Image:Microsoft Zune Logo.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:Microsoft Zune Logo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable under fair use (see our fair use policy).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. This is an automated message from BJBot 15:58, 28 January 2007 (UTC)


[edit] Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Quarantine (Red Dwarf).jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Quarantine (Red Dwarf).jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 09:34, 21 January 2008 (UTC)