From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
This blocked user (block log | autoblocks | rangeblocks | unblock | contribs | deleted contribs) has asked to be unblocked, but an administrator has reviewed and declined this request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy). Do not remove this unblock request while you are blocked.
Request reason: "Please unblock me, I have nothing to do with the user you say I am a sockpuppet of. Furthermore, I was given one more chance after the warning, I did not give any personal attacks and yet I was blocked anyway, how is this fair??"
Decline reason: "Per below. -- Netsnipe ► 19:30, 22 April 2007 (UTC)"
Please make any further unblock requests by using the {{unblock}} template. However, abuse of the template may result in your talk page being protected.
I would say this and this are personal attacks plus you have been identified as a sockpuppet. GDonato (talk) 19:18, 22 April 2007 (UTC)
-
- Now now, that is circumstantial and speculative evidence. It has no place in this review, and besides, I did NOT make those edits. Someone else did. EineNeueSchuhe 22:08, 22 April 2007 (UTC)
This blocked user (block log | autoblocks | rangeblocks | unblock | contribs | deleted contribs) has asked to be unblocked, but an administrator has reviewed and declined this request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy). Do not remove this unblock request while you are blocked.
Request reason: "There is no reason, none at all that my new username should be block for but one more minute. I say to those of you reviewing this unblock request, that the precedents for such a block are at best unwarrented, they are based on edits I did not make. You see, as soon as I started my username, the user known as Ichträgtkeineschuhe hijacked my user account and thus, made edits in my name. This user has done this to about several other users, targeting users with German sounding names so as to lead admins to think all these "socks" have something in common. I have proof of all of this, e-mail records, records in Wikipedia of harmful blanket reversions by these hijacked accounts and so fourth! All I ask is that one may unblock me for but 10 minutes, so I can supply ANI and so fourth with all the proof you need. If I am unable to do so, feel free to block me forever, but I know that won't happen, because I could very well be the best user that ever came upon this website, that is, if I am given the chance."
Decline reason: "Hijacked. Right. What's next? Kuru talk 23:03, 22 April 2007 (UTC)"
Please make any further unblock requests by using the {{unblock}} template. However, abuse of the template may result in your talk page being protected.
This blocked user (block log | autoblocks | rangeblocks | unblock | contribs | deleted contribs) has asked to be unblocked, but an administrator has reviewed and declined this request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy). Do not remove this unblock request while you are blocked.
Request reason: "Please unblock me, my account being hijacked is the absolute truth, and it has affected me and others who wish to edit positively, I mean, doesn't it strike you as odd that two other German sounding usernames were autoblocked just today? It is because this person is a master at stealing passwords. All I want to do is edit positively, What am I to do?"
Decline reason: "If a brand-new account immediately starts warring with another user, it's not a hijacked account, it's a sockpuppet. —dgiestc 02:10, 23 April 2007 (UTC)"
Please make any further unblock requests by using the {{unblock}} template. However, abuse of the template may result in your talk page being protected.
- On top of that, your user name "A new shoe" suggests sockpuppetry. —dgiestc 02:13, 23 April 2007 (UTC)
-
- Wikipedians have the freedom to choose the username they want, so long as it conforms to the username rules, and this one does.EineNeueSchuhe 02:24, 23 April 2007 (UTC)
This blocked user (block log | autoblocks | rangeblocks | unblock | contribs | deleted contribs) has asked to be unblocked, but an administrator has reviewed and declined this request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy). Do not remove this unblock request while you are blocked.
Request reason: "Please unblock me, I had ABSOLUTELY NOTHING to do with the "warring" with the other user you mention. This has already happened to other users. Once again, whoever this person is, this person is very good at locating passwords and as soon as a new account is opened, WHAM! it is stolen by him. The only reason I can sit here and type this is because the user in question obviously has no use for the account anymore, he has once again, ruined my editing experience. You gotta believe me! Unblock me for but 15 minutes, and I CAN PROVE EVERYTHING!"
Decline reason: "If he is indeed stealing your password, then that only reinforces the assertion that this account should NOT be unblocked as it is compromised. However, you are a blatant sockpuppet, as shown by your contributions, not an innocent user who had his password "stolen." We have heard enough of that to fall for your miserable attempts to deceive us. Enough of your lies and absurdity. — 210physicq (c) 04:34, 23 April 2007 (UTC)"
Please make any further unblock requests by using the {{unblock}} template. However, abuse of the template may result in your talk page being protected.
