Edward Hooper
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Edward Hooper (born 1951) is a British journalist best known for his book, The River, which investigates the origins and early epidemiology of AIDS and makes a case for the OPV AIDS hypothesis, the claim that the AIDS virus was accidentally created by scientists testing an experimental polio vaccine.
Contents |
[edit] The OPV AIDS Hypothesis
Hooper first encountered the OPV Aids hypothesis when he read a 1992 article in Rolling Stone magazine by freelance journalist Tom Curtis. Curtis described a theory advanced by Louis Pascal that the human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) was inadvertently caused in the late 1950s in the Belgian Congo by Hilary Koprowski's testing of an oral polio vaccine (OPV) on human subjects. This is the so-called "OPV AIDS hypothesis." Rolling Stone was later sued for defamation by Koprowski and retracted Curtis' article, writing: "The editors of Rolling Stone wish to clarify that they never intended to suggest in the article that there is any scientific proof, nor do they know of any scientific proof" that Koprowski's vaccine was the source of HIV/AIDS.[1]
Hooper travelled to Africa for 7 years of research before publishing The River. Hooper surmised that an experimental oral polio vaccine prepared in chimpanzee kidneys or blood may indeed have been the route through which the simian immunodeficiency virus (SIV) passed to humans and mutated into HIV sometime between 1957 and 1959. Hooper advocated for further scientific investigation of the OPV/AIDS hypothesis and for the observation of appropriate precautions with regard to future use of animal tissue culture in medical applications, particularly in the research and development of AIDS vaccines.
With the enthusiastic support of the eminent evolutionary biologist W. D. Hamilton, Hooper was invited to take part in a symposium at Royal Society of London, the first time a non-scientist had ever been invited to such a discussion. Hooper's presentation and data were heavily criticized and rejected by scientists at the gathering;[2] the vaccine expert Stanley Plotkin wrote at the time that "Testimony by eyewitnesses, documents of the time, epidemiological analysis, and ancillary phylogenetic, virologic and PCR data all concur to reject the [OPV AIDS] hypothesis as false and without factual foundation."[3] Currently, additional scientific evidence has led to a rejection of the OPV AIDS hypothesis by the scientific community.[4] Hooper continues to promote the hypothesis on his website, aidsorigins.com, where he criticizes the research and conduct of many of the scientists involved in the investigation and alleges a conspiracy to silence the hypothesis.[5]
[edit] References
- ^ Origin of AIDS update, published in Rolling Stone on December 9, 1993. Accessed March 20, 2008.
- ^ Plotkin SA, Teuwen DE, Prinzie A, Desmyter J (2001). "Postscript relating to new allegations made by Edward Hooper at The Royal Society Discussion Meeting on 11 September 2000". Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond., B, Biol. Sci. 356 (1410): 825–9. doi:. PMID 11405926.
- ^ Plotkin SA (2001). "Untruths and consequences: the false hypothesis linking CHAT type 1 polio vaccination to the origin of human immunodeficiency virus". Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond., B, Biol. Sci. 356 (1410): 815–23. doi:. PMID 11405925.
- ^ For summaries of scientific opinion on the topic, see:
- Cohen J (2001). "AIDS origins. Disputed AIDS theory dies its final death". Science 292 (5517): 615. PMID 11330303.
- Worobey M, Santiago ML, Keele BF, et al (2004). "Origin of AIDS: contaminated polio vaccine theory refuted". Nature 428 (6985): 820. doi:. PMID 15103367.
- ^ AIDSorigins.com, Edward Hooper's website
[edit] Bibliography
- Edward Hooper, The River, Little Brown and Company, 1999, ISBN 0-316-37261-7.
[edit] External links
- AIDSorigins.com: Hooper's website
- The Origins of AIDS (IMDB entry for the 2003 documentary with interviews of Hooper)
