User talk:Edugmail

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Welcome!

Hello, Edugmail, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! 

Please note that article that do not assert the notability of their subjects may be deleted, per policy. Thus, I deleted the Tada Ima Dojo article that you created. If you feel that the subject is notable, let me know, and I would be happy to discuss it, and possibly undelete the article. -- Where 01:40, 24 August 2006 (UTC)

Thank you for experimenting with the page Eduardo A. de Paula on Wikipedia. Your test worked, and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. ccwaters 17:15, 24 August 2006 (UTC)

Please refrain from adding nonsense to Wikipedia, as you did to Eduardo A. de Paula. It is considered vandalism. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. ccwaters 17:18, 24 August 2006 (UTC)

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize pages, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia.

Please refrain from undoing other people's edits repeatedly. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia under the three-revert rule, which states that nobody may revert a single page more than three times in 24 hours. (Note: this also means editing the page to reinsert an old edit. If the effect of your actions is to revert back, it qualifies as a revert.) Thank you. ccwaters 17:22, 24 August 2006 (UTC)

[edit] I Don´t understanding ???

Can you explain to me please?

Because it finds foolishness the inserted goods, it could explain how it arrived the this conclusion???


I'll try to explain. Wikipedia is not meant to be for vanity or advertisement. If you look at the other entries in the List of aikidoka - they all have sixth dan or above and are noteable for some other reason. At 2nd Dan and teaching at one dojo, and this is not against Eduardo A. de Paula, he just is not noteable. Secondly I suspect from your username that you are Mr. de Paula - you are not supposed to add information about yourself. Can I suggest that you write information about yourself on your user page - and add yourself to the Wikipedian aikidoka. Please take a look at my user page for an example.

There are other places that are best for listing yourself - I suggest aikiweb and aikido journal. Your entry for Wagner Bull was perfectly appropriate and I was personally glad that it was added even though I had to fix up the English far more than I should have needed to. Please be careful with the entries - better less that can be understood than more that can be not. If you have any questions just leave a message on my talk page (this is the normal way of passing on message).Peter Rehse 00:52, 25 August 2006 (UTC)

I think that you have been given a much better answer by PRehse than I could. The only other thing I can suggest is that you read Wikipedia:Notability. CambridgeBayWeather (Talk) 02:29, 25 August 2006 (UTC)