Talk:Edomoji

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Chinese character "Book" This article falls within the scope of WikiProject Writing systems, a WikiProject interested in improving the encyclopaedic coverage and content of articles relating to writing systems on Wikipedia. If you would like to help out, you are welcome to drop by the project page and/or leave a query at the project’s talk page.
Start This article has been rated as Start-Class on the Project’s quality scale.
Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the Project’s importance scale.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Japan, a project to improve all Japan-related articles. If you would like to help improve this and other Japan-related articles, please join the project. All interested editors are welcome.
Start This article has been rated as Start-Class on the assessment scale.
??? This article has not yet received a rating on the importance scale.

"Sumo" in traditional calligraphy
This article is part of WikiProject Sumo, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to sumo on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.
Start This article has been rated as Start-Class on the quality scale.
Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the importance scale.

[edit] Samples?

What, not a single image? Shinobu 14:07, 13 September 2006 (UTC)

Samples added. The Japanese version of the article used images from the Commons, which I added here. --Limetom 09:20, 13 December 2006 (UTC)

What do the samples say? TheLateDentarthurdent (talk) 20:00, 5 April 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Kakuji

Are the kakuji characters really the same as the other examples. It looks nearly illegible. 惑乱 分からん * \)/ (\ (< \) (2 /) /)/ * (talk) 17:03, 2 March 2008 (UTC)

It says “Kakuji sample” (角字見本 Kakuji mihon?). I’m not entirely sure that it counts as edomoji, but I don’t exactly have a degree in Japanese study or anything. At any rate, it is basically illegible to most people much like seal script. -BRPXQZME (talk) 17:10, 5 May 2008 (UTC)