Wikipedia:Editor review/darkstar949

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

[edit] darkstar949

darkstar949 (talk ยท contribs) I have been on Wikipedia for over a year and a half now and I while I do not maintain an extensive list of articles that I contribute to, I would like to ensure that the work I contribute is the best it could be. Darkstar949 02:30, 17 March 2007 (UTC)

Reviews

Okay. The dispute between you and SU182 over there at OS-tan is getting pretty nasty. You sometimes come close to the line of WP:CIVIL without actually crossing it - just be careful. Your response to the anonymous IP who said "How dare you ruin that article!" was unwelcoming - again, not a violation, but be careful.

Even though you've been here a while, you still don't have a lot of experience. Part of the reason for the aforementioned conflict is that your writing skills are not at a college level. You tried in good faith to improve the article; whether you did or didn't is debatable (I briefly checked both versions, and I have no clear opinion). You need to work together with other editors. You focus on bringing in new material and references, and they can help you with editing and formatting. Maybe you should become (more) active in Wikipedia:Wikiproject Anime and Manga. You might also find it helpful to put the articles linked from your userpage on your watchlist, if you haven't already done that.

I wish you good luck. YechielMan 04:01, 25 March 2007 (UTC)

Comments

Questions

  1. Of your contributions to Wikipedia, are there any about which you are particularly pleased, and why?
    Honestly, the edits that I am most pleased with it when I find more references to add to an article; however, I have been working on trying to standardize some of the military awards pages so that is nice to have done at the end of the day.
  2. Have you been in any conflicts over editing in the past or do you feel other users have caused you stress? How have you dealt with it and how will you deal with it in the future?
    To be honest I am currently in the middle of a dispute over the OS-tan article for a fairly dramatic re-write that I did, most of the page was re-written. However, I would like to think that it was for the better.