Wikipedia:Editor review/Wassupwestcoast
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
[edit] Wassupwestcoast
Wassupwestcoast (talk · contribs) I have been editing for almost one year. I would like to know about those things I don't know that I don't know. I'm sure other editors will spot gaps in my WP editing skills. Wassupwestcoast 21:01, 3 September 2007 (UTC)
Reviews
You've been working on some good articles. This collective edit improved the article on the Episcopal Church in the United States. I think you might enjoy paying more attention to the high-culture aspects of Wikipedia at WP:GAC and WP:FAC, or click "Featured content" on the left sidebar. I wish you good luck. Shalom (Hello • Peace) 13:11, 8 October 2007 (UTC)
Comments
- View this user's edit count using Interiot's 'Wannabe Kate' Tool.
- Edits such as this (which I just noticed by chance) are not helping anybody. If you like, be bold and edit yourself, but don't remove tags instead of editing. Odedee 08:20, 18 September 2007 (UTC)
Questions
- Of your contributions to Wikipedia, are there any about which you are particularly pleased, and why?
- My contribution to Harry and the Potters has pleased me because in editing the article, I think I've turned the corner from endless vandalism reverts and actually adding constructive content to Wikipedia. Wassupwestcoast 21:09, 3 September 2007 (UTC)
- Have you been in any conflicts over editing in the past or do you feel other users have caused you stress? How have you dealt with it and how will you deal with it in the future?
- Yes, I've had editing conflicts. I use the Talk pages as much as possible to sort things out - even with IP users - and try to reach a consenus with the other contributing editors. In some cases, I've abandoned a page rather than deal with weird editing. Wassupwestcoast 21:09, 3 September 2007 (UTC)
