Wikipedia:Editor review/Tmalmjursson

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

[edit] User:Tmalmjursson

Tmalmjursson (talk ยท contribs) I have been with Wikipedia now for almost 2 years, and during that time, I have amassed roughly 1000 or so edits, mainly due to the fact that I no longer have a home internet connection. However, out of those edits, I feel that some are good and some could have done with improvement. I am therefore asking for an editor review to evaluate what I have done, and see whether there are things I could change about the way I edit. Thanks. Thor Malmjursson 22:21, 2 December 2006 (UTC)

Reviews

  • This is my first review, so bear with me. My impression of you is that you are a typical worker. I admire your use of user talk pages to negotiate. Your edit space proportions are very well sized, and you know when to look for an admin. However, I suggest that you participate in more Wikipedia space things, like Xfd's and RFA's. They will give you a good idea of the workings of Wikipedia. Try also to expand your scope too. A good method is to press the Random Article link on the navigation box, and see what edits you can make. You will find that you can learn much, and expand your experience. Finally, try to keep calm, even when people abuse the "Wikipedia is not a crystal ball" rule. Just keep leaving warning on their talk page, and if they keep going, give them more warnings until you are stuck with the last warning, and finally a suggested block. You're a good editor, you just have more to see and do. bibliomaniac15 02:04, 7 December 2006 (UTC)


Comments

Questions

  1. Of your contributions to Wikipedia, are there any about which you are particularly pleased, and why?
    The main articles I am pleased with are the ones which I have translated from other Wikipedias, most notably Peter Maffay, Tabaluga and Helme Heine. These please me because I know I have expanded the Wiki and allowed more people to read the work others have created.
  2. Have you been in any conflicts over editing in the past or do you feel other users have caused you stress? How have you dealt with it and how will you deal with it in the future?
    The only conflicts I have ever been in are one to do with Homosexuality, where I was part of an edit war, subsequently resolved by discussion; I have also had an edit conflict with the article on Tabaluga, where someone was adding information which I could not verify for some time, but subsequently managed to, and Bachmann Thomas and Friends, where there has been reversion of parts added which contravened WP:NOT and also at least 1 breech of the 3RR. All of these issues are now resolved.
    I have been stressed on several occasions, but have always managed to come to terms with my problems, face them and return to normal through discussion with my peers. In future, I see myself coming more to terms with stress, and coping better.