Wikipedia:Editor review/Teh tennisman 3

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

[edit] Teh tennisman

Teh tennisman (talk · contribs) It's been about six months since my last Editor review, and I feel that I have done an excellent job of increasing my all-around edit count, while trying to be less WikiGnommish (see my edit count for Roger Federer. I think that with a few more months (weeks?) of main and wikipedia-space edits, I will be ready for a halfway decent RfA. Not saying that I have a case of adminitis, but I would like the extra privileges to help with my RC and NP patrol, as well as for use at WP:RFPP. And yes, I have a high Userspace edit count. I know. I would like to know what the community thinks. Thank you. tennisman 03:32, 24 June 2007 (UTC)

Reviews

You`ve falsely accused multiple people of vandalism, when they didn`t vandalize at all.

Lima bean, would you care to elaborate? That's a severe allegation. Shalom Hello 16:32, 25 June 2007 (UTC)

I don't have much to say. You're not close to becoming an administrator. You're edit count and experience level is just barely enough for someone with a squeaky clean record, and your talk page shows that you've had some trouble incidents. Keep up your overall good work and don't consider running for adminship until you feel ready to use the tools for applications other than RC and New Page patrol.

You've been warned a couple of times for tagging articles as speedy candidates without justification. One of them was a midfielder on a Turkish soccer team, and while he's unimpressive, he meets notability rules and it's a valid stub. As you continue with patrolling, you should acquire a pattern recognition for borderline cases. When in doubt, use WP:PROD.

On the other end of the spectrum, your article writing with Roger Federer and other figures is commendable. I think you have a future in the standard encyclopedia writing business that we do because a lot remains to be done. You should consider becoming more active in Wikipedia:WikiProject Tennis.

I wish you good luck. Shalom Hello 16:46, 25 June 2007 (UTC)

Comments

Questions

  1. Of your contributions to Wikipedia, are there any about which you are particularly pleased, and why?
    Well, I am mostly a WikiGnome. However, I would like to think that I have played a part in Getting Roger Federer to the level it is now (a GA nominee, and hopefully a GA). I have also done quite a bit of work on Guitar Hero II. I submitted it for a Peer Review and did most of the work that the reviewer said should be done, as well as autoformatting it using AndyZ's Peer Reviewer. I am also proud of some of my work while on RC Patrol. I have reverted vandalism on a number of user pages, and have even gotten my own pages vandalized because of it.
  2. Have you been in any conflicts over editing in the past or do you feel other users have caused you stress? How have you dealt with it and how will you deal with it in the future?
    I have not been involved in any full-scale conflicts. I had one conflict with User:Onofre Bouvila (which I saved in my sandbox.) They created a CSD A1 type article, and I spotted it very quickly while on Newpage patrol. However, as they let me know, it was soon to be expanded. As such, I removed my {{db-nocontext}} from the page, and allowed the article to be expanded. Other than that, I have had no real problems.

Additionals from Dfrg.msc

Borrowed from Glen (talk · contribs), I'm sure he wont mind:

Speedy Delete or not:

  1. CSD1
  2. CSD2
  3. CSD3
  4. CSD4
  5. CSD5

Vandalism or or not:

  1. [1]
  2. [2]
  3. [3]
  4. [4]
  5. [5]
  6. [6]

Have fun! Dfrg.msc 07:09, 5 July 2007 (UTC)