Wikipedia:Editor review/PrestonH (2)

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

[edit] PrestonH

PrestonH (talk ยท contribs) I request to be reviewed because I feel like I haven't enough feedback in my last review and I reverted much more vandalism than before. I did 200+ vandal reversions and I would like some feedback/criticism so I can do better in the future. I do not wish to be an admin. Thank you very much! PrestonH | talk | contribs | editor review | 06:11, 19 February 2007 (UTC)

Reviews

  • From what I can see so far, you look to be a good user who understands policy, and applies it well. Your recent vandalism reversions looked excellent, and I like the fact that you test out things (like your sig) before you use them in Wikipedia. I'm gonna check a little further back in your history and expand this review some more. Btw, have you ever tried VandalProof? If not, you might want to. Alex43223 T | C | E 02:34, 14 March 2007 (UTC)

Comments

Questions

  1. Of your contributions to Wikipedia, are there any about which you are particularly pleased, and why?
    I am happy with my 200+ vandal revision and my occasional grammar checking in articles. I sometimes go to WP:RFA to voice my opinion on admin nominees.
  2. Have you been in any conflicts over editing in the past or do you feel other users have caused you stress? How have you dealt with it and how will you deal with it in the future?
    Well, on occasions, sometimes the page has been vandalized by both an anon and the real editor which rollback was use accidently so the page was still vandalized. That bothered me so I had to reverted manually. I will deal with that conflict by saying to myself we make occasional mistakes and we plan to learn fron them.