Wikipedia:Editor review/Nat.tang

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

[edit] Nat.tang

Nat.tang (talk · contribs) Hi Y'all, I've been an active editor/user for the last three months and I would just like to hear the opinions of other editors, as well as to keep myself and my editing in check. I would love to hear any comments, questions, or concerns you might have about me or my editing. Nat Tang talk to me! | Check on my contributions!|Email Me! 04:09, 18 June 2007 (UTC)

Reviews

  • Bonjour Nat.tang et bienvenue sur Wikipedia! Je suis français-canadinne, et je parle français un peu. Bon, j'habite à Ohio. Wow that took a while for me to get done with! Ha, whats up? My name is wpktsfs and I am going to give you a little review here. First off, it seems that you started really editing about last month, even though you have been registered since August. Great answer to the second question. Nice userpage layout. Come talk to me in a few months and I would be glad, granted your progress stays the same, and I will definitely consider nominating you for adminship. Cheers and good luck with all of your edits from one monarch supporter to another. --wpktsfs 03:14, 19 June 2007 (UTC)

Comments

Questions

  1. Of your contributions to Wikipedia, are there any about which you are particularly pleased, and why?
    Not really, if I really have to choose it would be three particular articles: York Mills C.I., John Tory, and Associated Gospel Churches of Canada. Why? Well, it's probably because I had spent the most time on those articles when I first joined the Community as an active member.
  2. Have you been in any conflicts over editing in the past or do you feel other users have caused you stress? How have you dealt with it and how will you deal with it in the future?
    Hell yeh...(chuckles). For me, there was one particular person: TingMing (talk · contribs) and his SOCKs. He would just constantly try to push his POV, attacked other editors with personal attacks, reject all other edits, refused to listen to friendly advise, and even created a few SOCKs to vandalize the userpages of people who had confronted and had dealt with him and his uncivil behaviour. At first, I thought that he was just a person someone could reason with, but then his true colours shown after dealing with him for a while. I tell you he is one vicious person. Well, in the end, his main user, TingMing (talk · contribs), (at least I think it's his main user), was banned indef. for distruptive editing, vandalism, personal attacks, sockpuppetry, and I think the list goes on but I can't quite remember. He comes back once in a while, in the form of a SOCK, to push POV and vandalize userpages, but always results in him being banned. How have I dealt with it? Well, I first tried talking to him, then after it became apparent that he wasn't going to listen, after the indef. ban, and after the SOCK attacks, I did a bit of requesting here and there and got my userpage semi-protect as to prevent and stop any immediate vandalism of my user page by this person and other misguided people who view me and my user as a threat (I don't know why they would think that...oh well). How will I deal with something like this in the future? Well, I would firstly try to avoid pulling myself into a conflict if necessary, and then if that isn't possible, talk it out with the person, find out why there is a conflict and try to resolve it peacefully through compromise, friendly, not forceful, advice, and try to negotiate a middle/common ground. If that doesn't work then there always options through the official channels, i.e. ArbComm or Mediation.