Wikipedia:Editor review/Lilac Soul

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

[edit] Lilac_Soul

Lilac_Soul (talk · contribs) I've been editing on Wikipedia for a while now, and I always think it's good to get some feedback to see if there's anything I should consider doing differently Lilac Soul (talk contribs count) 08:26, 4 September 2007 (UTC)

Reviews

Comments

Questions

  1. Of your contributions to Wikipedia, are there any about which you are particularly pleased, and why?
    I think I did a pretty good job in the effort to get Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows up to par, making sure the plot summary wasn't too detailed, and that everything else was well sourced. Also, I like my contributions to the referendums in the template {{Danish elections}}, because I knew nothing about them when I started and I ended up getting to of them DYK status.
  2. Have you been in any conflicts over editing in the past or do you feel other users have caused you stress? How have you dealt with it and how will you deal with it in the future?
    Yes, a few times at least. For instance on the Rene Reinmann article. I dealt with it by leaving a comment in the source (the type that doesn't show up when just viewing the article) about discussing it on the talkpage. Unless it is obvious vandalism, I generally try and not get involved in edit wars, but establish consensus on the talkpage. If someone repeatedly reverts my edits that have talkpage-consensus, I will first inform them of the talkpage discussion, and if that doesn't help, I'll view it as vandalism and give them the appropriate warnings.