Wikipedia:Editor review/GeorgeMoney2

GeorgeMoney (talk · contribs) I know I have done one before, but there is no rule that says you can't do it again. And, I want to be reviewed.

Reviews

George is very like General Eisenhower (talk · contribs), acting out of good faith for the benefit of the community - but not always in the best ways. Couple of things I'd love to see: Answers to the below question. Wait, that's only one! Computerjoe 's talk 15:34, 13 May 2006 (UTC)

How do I act like him? GeorgeMoney ^T·C 00:02, 24 June 2006 (UTC)
Very helpful, always on top of things, great overall editor. I can't think of a single suggestion. Which doesn't make this review too helpful... S t e v e o 2 11:11, 30 May 2006 (UTC)
Great user! FellowWikip e dian 21:00, 22 June 2006 (UTC)

Comments

See this user's edit history with Interiot's tool and edit summary usage (Warning:Both tools have stopped updating and the edit counts are way off. Please consider using Flcelloguy's Tool or Interiot's Tool 2)

Questions

Of your articles or contributions to Wikipedia, are there any about which you are particularly pleased, and why?

Answer
Have you been in any conflicts over editing in the past or do you feel other users have caused you stress? How have you dealt with it and how will you deal with it in the future?

Answer