Wikipedia:Editor review/Geekamalloy

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

[edit] Geekamalloy*

Geekamalloy (talk ยท contribs) I got here from the community portal and I wanted to know what fellow users thought about me and my contributions. Geeky Malloy 02:29, 9 June 2008 (UTC)

Reviews

  • review by Dlohcierekim Clinton Kelly (minister)-- not bad editing for a beginner. In the cite, you should put more compete info--- [URL History of the Pacific Northwest: Oregon and Washington. Portland, Oregon. North Pacific History Company, 1889. on Ancestry.com. Online. Date accessed.] Unfortunately, there does not appear to be an assertion of notability. Please review WP:N and WP:BIO. It would be good to set your preferences so the software will require you to complete the edit summary. Communication is important. When reverting vandalism, it is important to warn vandals. There are templated warnings that make this easier at Wikipedia:Template messages/User talk namespace. Hope this helps, cheers. Dlohcierekim 03:44, 9 June 2008 (UTC)


Comments

Questions

  1. Of your contributions to Wikipedia, are there any about which you are particularly pleased, and why?
    I am pleased with my Clinton Kelly (minister) article and my anti-vandalism efforts.
  2. Have you been in any conflicts over editing in the past or do you feel other users have caused you stress? How have you dealt with it and how will you deal with it in the future?
    No. If I had a problem I would just work it out with the user. Even in real-life I rarely get mad at my peers. I just talk it out with them.