Wikipedia:Editor review/Evilclown93 Second time
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
[edit] Evilclown93
Evilclown93 (talk ยท contribs) This is my second review, and I generally want some comments on what should I improve and comments on my past contributions. I'm at about 1500 edits by now. Evilclown93 15:13, 15 April 2007 (UTC)
Reviews
- I'm sorry to disappoint you, but I can't find anything wrong. You use edit summaries, you've been working to improve articles, you discuss featured article candidates, you opine at Requests for Adminship, you revert vandalism, you communicate well with other users, and last but not least, you subscribe to the Signpost. What I didn't look at was the specific quality of your contribs (e.g. minor versus major edits, grammar, referencing, etc.). In terms of diversity and distribution, though, you are a model citizen. Cheers. :) YechielMan 04:44, 20 April 2007 (UTC)
Comments
- View this user's edit count using Interiot's 'Wannabe Kate' Tool.
- View this user's edit summary usage with mathbot's tool
Questions
- Of your contributions to Wikipedia, are there any about which you are particularly pleased, and why?
- I'm a regular contributor to Wikiproject Ice Hockey, and I have signed up for Wikiproject Canada, but that is my only contribution there to date. Right now, I'm trying to get the Stanley Cup featured, and now it has a request for featured status.
- Have you been in any conflicts over editing in the past or do you feel other users have caused you stress? How have you dealt with it and how will you deal with it in the future?
- I haven't been in conflicts in the past 4 to 6 weeks. I've dealt with them adequately, in my opinion, and I don't feel that in the future I'm going to lose it.
