Wikipedia:Editor review/DodgerOfZion

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

[edit] DodgerOfZion

DodgerOfZion (talk · contribs) I've been involved in some mudsling lately, but I want a fourth opinion on how I'm doing. DodgerOfZion 03:37, 1 July 2007 (UTC)

Reviews

As I was archiving this page, I noticed nobody had commented up here. I checked a couple of talk page comments: a response to a "no thanks" to join a WikiProject, and a vandal warning to User:Daveryan. Spot on. As you gain more experience, you will learn not to sweat the small stuff from the "idiot vandals", and to assume good faith most of the time. I wish you good luck. Shalom Hello 03:26, 5 August 2007 (UTC)

Comments


Questions

  1. Of your contributions to Wikipedia, are there any about which you are particularly pleased, and why?
    I'm most pleased with starting my high school's Wikipedia page as seen here, as well as keeping the drama and Concord University sites in proper order.
  2. Have you been in any conflicts over editing in the past or do you feel other users have caused you stress? How have you dealt with it and how will you deal with it in the future?
    I'm mostly stressed by the idiot vandals who have little else to do. I simply revert, report, and move on...most of the time, and that's what I plan on doing again, should the need arise.
Just a note, don't insult the vandals. --wpktsfs 03:06, 9 July 2007 (UTC)
I don't. I simply leave a warning on their talk page, but I apologize for thinking out loud. :-P --DodgerOfZion 04:40, 9 July 2007 (UTC)

Additionals from Dfrg.msc Borrowed from Glen (talk · contribs), I'm sure he wont mind. These should test you editing skills, and show if you have any weaknesses which you can work on. So, just write your answer next to the Question. Good luck.

Speedy Delete or not:

  1. CSD1
  2. CSD2
  3. CSD3
  4. CSD4
  5. CSD5

Vandalism or or not:

  1. [1]
  2. [2]
  3. [3]
  4. [4]
  5. [5]
  6. [6]

Have fun! Dfrg.msc 07:15, 5 July 2007 (UTC)

In response

Speedy Delete or not: This should be easy...
  1. CSD1 - Yes.
  2. CSD2 - No.
  3. CSD3 - No, would clean up and look for sources/copyvios.
  4. CSD4 - Yes.
  5. CSD5 - No, would clean up.

Vandalism or or not: Oh boy, of all the topics...

  1. [7] - Not necessarily vandalism, would check user's edit history; not sourced, so notability is dubious.
  2. [8] - Yes. What in the name of Dante does that number soup have to do with anything?
  3. [9] - Quite obviously yes.
  4. [10] - Yes.
  5. [11] - Not necessarily vandalism, but a seriously misguided edit.
  6. [12] - Not necessarily vandalism, but it sounds dubious. --DodgerOfZion 07:46, 5 July 2007 (UTC)

Resp

Not bad at all, It's encouraging to see that your not so quick on the deletion trigger as many around her, but I'm just an old inclusionist. The important thing to note is that, "all edits are effort" and if you destroy that effort, you'd better have a good reason. The vandalisms was pretty much spot on, good work. Cheers!