Wikipedia:Editor review/Deflagro

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

[edit] Deflagro

Deflagro (talk ยท contribs) I would like to see in what areas of my editing could use some improvement and mainly just see how I can improve here. Deflagro C/T 17:29, 22 November 2007 (UTC) Edit: I just noticed that Interiot's 'Wannabe Kate' Tool is wrong. It says I only have 1410 edits, but when I got to my preferences it says I have 1516 edits. Also where it shows what I have edited, those are edits from a LONG time ago. If you want to view more recent edits please view my contributions. Thanks! Deflagro C/T 19:02, 22 November 2007 (UTC)

Reviews

[edit] Review by Pedro

Great work so far. I reviewed Francis Drake and you input there looks good, but just as importantly you're using the talk page to discuss the article. That's vital to consensus building. I see that generally content contribution is what you want to do. That's superb, after all it's what we're here for. I would however sugest calming down your sig. a bit though - exotic fonts and lots of code can be a bit concerning for some - it's not a biggie however. FYI The reason for the difference between your count by the Interiot tool and you preferences is deleted contributions. For example, if you a tag an article under WP:CSD and it gets deleted, or you edit an article subsequently removed the Interiot tool will not count them. Don't worry though. WP:EDITCOUNT isn't everything! Quality over quantity. Thanks! Pedro :  Chat  21:42, 23 November 2007 (UTC)

Comments

Questions

  1. Of your contributions to Wikipedia, are there any about which you are particularly pleased, and why?
    I feel my best contribution is I run Portal:Piracy by myself. The creator told me when I signed on with the Portal that he would probably not be very active enough to run it himself. Sometimes my updates have been a little late, but I try to create the new pages in advance.
  2. Have you been in any conflicts over editing in the past or do you feel other users have caused you stress? How have you dealt with it and how will you deal with it in the future?
    On the Francis Drake article, I had a misunderstanding with User:Hispa. It wasn't really an argument or a disagreement but more of a communication error with different references saying different things. (Full discussion can be viewed here).