Wikipedia:Editor review/Crazytales

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

[edit] Crazytales

Crazytales (talk · contribs) I'm considering an RfA around March to April. I'd just like to submit this ER to see what people think of me and if I'm admin material. I have two failed RfAs, one in May 2005 and one in December 2006. I feel I've made effort to improve the quality of my contributions since. Most of my work is done in XfD's and reverting vandalism - I use a combination of Lupin's, VoA's, and Lightdarkness' tools. ~Crazytales (AAAA!) 12:53, 1 February 2007 (UTC)

Reviews

  • Hello, Crazytales, I haven't seen you for sometime after the Esperanza MFD. I believe that you've done an exemplary job as a Wikipedian. As you're really striving to become an admin soon (advice about becoming an admin is being debated fiercely in the talk page), I would really suggest you start to take a serious look at the questions that people pose in RFAs. Examine how successful people answer these questions to prepare yourself. I also find the lack of talk edits somewhat disconcerting, as Wikipedia is based on discussion. All in all, great work, and I hope to see you again sometime in the near future. bibliomaniac15 03:06, 2 February 2007 (UTC)

Comments

Questions

  1. Of your contributions to Wikipedia, are there any about which you are particularly pleased, and why?
    I'm proud of all my contributions, and I don't like emphasising some over others. However, I'm pleased with my contributions to automobile related articles, which are mostly adding photos and cleaning up. I'm also proud of my vandalism reversion. I often edit articles relating to stuff I have and have had experience with, like Virgin Mobile cellphones and Logitech mice. ~Crazytales (AAAA!) 12:57, 1 February 2007 (UTC)
  1. Have you been in any conflicts over editing in the past or do you feel other users have caused you stress? How have you dealt with it and how will you deal with it in the future?
    I had one small conflict with RJN over Evanescence's classification as gothic rock. I put that in, he reverted, I approached him on his talkpage about it and backed my classification up with data from last.fm. He apologised to me about it and allowed me to revert. Overall, I'd say we both handled the issue civilly but ignorantly, as neither of us was aware of the ongoing article-talk-page discussion regarding the classification. Another conflict I had was with User:A Man In Black regarding xlinks to veekun.com pokédex in Pokémon species articles. We discussed it on WT:PCP, I feel that I handled that well. I'll deal with editing conflicts by taking a deep breath and discussing it with the user. I try my utmost to remain civil and follow WP:NPA. ~Crazytales (AAAA!) 12:57, 1 February 2007 (UTC)