Wikipedia:Editor review/Britishrailclass91
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
[edit] Britishrailclass91
Britishrailclass91 (talk ยท contribs)
Reviews
- Your edits look rather casual. Consider doing research while writing articles (see WP:CITE for more info). And try to get along and co-operate with fellow editors. It will make your editing experience a lot better. - Mailer Diablo 15:51, 10 June 2008 (UTC)
- View this user's edit count using Interiot's 'Wannabe Kate' Tool
Questions
- Of your contributions to Wikipedia, are there any about which you are particularly pleased, and why?
- Yes, my improvements to railway articles
- Have you been in any conflicts over editing in the past or do you feel other users have caused you stress? How have you dealt with it and how will you deal with it in the future?
- Can't remember
Comments
- Comment This user has obviously has forgotten that they performed unjustified personal attack on me three times (which is harassment). They then did give a fully apology and stopped. I suppose you could say "all is forgotten......" Btline (talk) 13:11, 31 May 2008 (UTC)
- Comment User seriously needs to go and read the policies, FAQs and howtos about how wikipedia works. He is seriously lacking in even a basic grounding so far, and are only succeeding in disrupting articles and annoying editors. He seems to think wikipedia is a news site to be updated constanty with most minor/trivial of details about anything and everything rail related. He also seems to be a perpetual leaver of the site without actually leaving MickMacNee (talk) 14:11, 31 May 2008 (UTC)
- Comment A quick and easy way for this user to become a better contributor would be to write edit summaries for all their edits. If I recall they've expressed an interest in becoming an administrator. Such a low usage of edit summaries would seriously harm their ability to pass an RfA. Adambro (talk) 18:24, 31 May 2008 (UTC)