Wikipedia:Editor review/AQu01rius 2
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
[edit] AQu01rius
AQu01rius (talk · contribs) I just want some outside opinion. I basically know what I need to improve still, but I'd like to hear what other user says to see if I'm being over-critical on myself. Thanks! AQu01rius (User • Talk) 00:37, 17 April 2007 (UTC)
Reviews
- You've got a lot of great contributions and I'm having difficulty seeing any problems anywhere really. The only things I could suggest are maybe shortening your signature (it's three lines of code on my monitor) and getting an article up to GA or FA. Pulling an article up to that status is extremely rewarding, and you end up learning a lot of things you wouldn't otherwise learn from observation alone- balanced writing, proper referencing, etc. Keep up the good work. --Wafulz 15:56, 22 April 2007 (UTC)
Comments
- View this user's edit count using Interiot's 'Wannabe Kate' Tool.
- View this user's edit summary usage with mathbot's tool
I realize that my edit summary usage is not full.
Questions
- Of your contributions to Wikipedia, are there any about which you are particularly pleased, and why?
- I keep a brag sheet for this, although it's not up to date. I'm impressed with my 10 approved DYKs, 40+ lengthy article from scratch. I also contributed heavily in many other fields such as WikiProjects, Portals, peer reviews, editor reviews and more.
- Have you been in any conflicts over editing in the past or do you feel other users have caused you stress? How have you dealt with it and how will you deal with it in the future?
- The only conflict I can ever recall was a editing dispute in Portal:China. A editor was dissatisfied with my changes, so we ended up spending three days in a long discussion. In regular content disputes, assume good faith and discuss issues throughly will solve nearly everything, even though it takes time.
