User talk:Editor126
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
An editor has expressed a concern that this user may be a sock puppet of Soccermeko. Please refer to editing habits and/or contributions; this policy subsection may also be helpful. Account information: block log – current autoblocks – edits – logs |
This page is currently protected from editing to prevent Editor126 (talk • contribs • block logauto) from using it to make disruptive edits or continuing to abuse the {{unblock}} template. If you have come here to issue a new message to this user, it means the block has expired. Please unprotect the page, ask an administrator to do so, or request unprotection here. |
Unblock Now
This blocked user (block log | autoblocks | rangeblocks | unblock | contribs | deleted contribs) has asked to be unblocked, but an administrator has reviewed and declined this request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy). Do not remove this unblock request while you are blocked.
Request reason: "That's mean. Wikipedia was design so anyone can contribute information. You can't block someone because you feel they are helping or doing the same thing as another. I think you need to block for stupity, vandalism, attack a user(me), not be fair, and not giving me the benefit of the doubt because you assume. What you assumed is wrong. I think you need to be block indefinitely for the following reasons. And how can I be posting false information to the Nicole Wray page, stupid. According to history, you added #76 to the "I'm Lookin'" page. It hit #66, get it right. I got this"
Decline reason: "You were not blocked for any conduct with this account. You were blocked for sockpuppetry. It doesn't matter what you think of your block, you must contest it through official channels and not create other accounts to circumvent them. — Daniel Case (talk) 02:46, 4 April 2008 (UTC)"
Please make any further unblock requests by using the {{unblock}} template. However, abuse of the template may result in your talk page being protected.
Not A Sock
This blocked user (block log | autoblocks | rangeblocks | unblock | contribs | deleted contribs) has asked to be unblocked, but an administrator has reviewed and declined this request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy). Do not remove this unblock request while you are blocked.
Request reason: "I'm not sockpuppet. Unless sockpuppet means new member than I am not a sock. How you block someone because that's the first thing they edit. You are stupid for that. Also, I had not added any wrong information, but I can prove that you did. Stop being stupid and admit that you were wrong."
Decline reason: "Obvious sockpuppet. Page protected due to personal attacks. — Yamla (talk) 21:05, 4 April 2008 (UTC)"
Please make any further unblock requests by using the {{unblock}} template. However, abuse of the template may result in your talk page being protected.