Talk:Edith Robinson

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Portal	Edith Robinson is within the scope of WikiProject Australia, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Australia and Australia-related topics. If you would like to participate, visit the project page.
Stub	This article has been rated as stub-class on the quality scale.
Low	This article has been rated as low-importance on the importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Australian sports.
Assessment comments This article has been rated for quality and/or importance but has no comments yet. If appropriate, please review the article and then leave comments here to identify the strengths and weaknesses of the article and what work it will need.

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography. For more information, visit the project page.	Biography Portal
Stub	This article has been rated as Stub-Class on the project's quality scale. [FAQ]
	This article is supported by the Sports and games work group.

It is requested that a picture or pictures of this person be included in this article to improve its quality.

[edit] Random Evaluation

This article is a randomly selected subject of my attempt to guage the evolving quality of Wikipedia. I will occasionally select 10 article at random (using the "Random article" feature, of course) and grade each of them using the Wikipedia:Good Article standard below:

What is a good article?
A good article has the following attributes.
1. It is well written.
2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.
3. It is broad in its coverage, addressing all major aspects of the topic (this requirement is slightly weaker than the "comprehensiveness" required by WP:FAC, and allows shorter articles and broad overviews of large topics to be listed);.
4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
5. It is stable, i.e., it does not change significantly from day to day and is not the subject of ongoing edit wars.
6. It contains images, where possible, to illustrate the topic.

[edit] May 21, 2008

1. Edith Robinson
   • Well written? - Short and informative.
   • Factually accurate? - Yes. Referenced claims.
   • Broad in its coverage? FAILED - Minimal coverage should be expanded.
   • NPOV - Yes.
   • Is it stable? - FAILED. (Article younger than 90 days)
   • Images - Yes. But could be improved to only picture subject of article.

- Davodd (talk) 18:19, 21 May 2008 (UTC)