Talk:Economy of the People's Republic of China

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

A summary of this article appears in People's Republic of China.

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Economy of the People's Republic of China article.
Article policies
Archives: 1, 2
Economy of the People's Republic of China is a former featured article candidate. Please view the links under Article milestones below to see why the nomination failed. For older candidates, please check the archive.
January 14, 2007 Featured article candidate Not promoted
This article is within the scope of the following WikiProjects:
This article is part of WikiProject China, a project to improve all China-related articles. If you would like to help improve this and other China-related articles, please join the project. All interested editors are welcome.
B This article has been rated as B-Class on the quality scale. (see comments)
More information about this article...
Business and economics Portal
This article is within the scope of the Business and Economics WikiProject.
B rated as B-Class on the assessment scale
Top rated as top-importance on the assessment scale
This article is within the scope of the Economics WikiProject, an effort to create, expand, organize, and improve economics-related articles..
B rated as B-Class on the assessment scale
High rated as High-importance on the importance scale
Other languages WikiProject Echo has identified Economy of the People's Republic of China as a foreign language featured article. You may be able to improve this article with information from the Vietnamese language Wikipedia.
This article has an assessment summary page.
To-do list for Economy of the People's Republic of China: edit · history · watch · refresh

Here are some tasks you can do:
    Archive
    Archives
    Archive 1. Archive 2. Archive 3.


    Pruned sections.
    Internet resources.

    Contents


    [edit] Checklist / to do (see archives)

    • Article needs updating
    • List the trading agreements/blocs that China is party to or a member of
    • Include the exchange rate of Yuan to the US Dollar during 1950-80
    • Inflation over 10 years
    • A logarithmic graph to replace [complement] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Image:Prc1952-2005gdp.gif
    • Some tables, graphs etc showing trends
    • Recent economic history
    • Components of Manufacturing
    • Banking and Financial Services
    • Other Services eg telecommunications, sales, retail etc
    • Manufacturing Industries eg food and drink, capital equipment, electonics, etc
    • Knowledge based industry eg biotechnology, medical research and development
    • I think this article contains significant information which ought to be integrated into the article. It seems some trends are being set which will result in major changes. Fred Talk 13:00, 16 February 2008 (UTC)

    [edit] Macroeconomic Trends

    I've updated the data, and added some historical data for inflation and the renminbi. DOR (HK) (talk) 07:09, 28 January 2008 (UTC) DOR (HK) Jan 27, 2008

    Does anyone know what year this refers to? For purchasing power parity comparisons, the US dollar is exchanged at 2.05 CNY only. I ask because a single year reference without a date is worthless. DOR (HK) (talk) 02:30, 31 January 2008 (UTC) DOR (HK) Jan 31, 2008.

    If I understand purchasing power parity right, it refers to the lower prices in China which makes Chinese money go further if purchases are made there. For example, pork, now considered "high" in China still sells for less than a dollar a pound while pork in the US sells for about $2.50 a pound. The quoted figure illustrates the value, expressed in dollars, of how much a yuan will buy in the domestic Chinese market which has generally low prices due to generally low wages. It is a kind of comparison between the market basket a dollar or euro will buy in the US or Europe and the market basket a yuan will buy in China. Fred Talk 14:56, 29 February 2008 (UTC)


    [edit] PPP, Nominal

    One statistic has China breathing down on the US. ready to over take it. The other statistic shows that China shouldn't even be considered as any economic threat to the US. A difference of 10 trillion dollars is fairly large, no? What should be the standard economic measurement?

    -G

    The standard (generally more reliable) economic measurement would be PPP; in other words, the statistic where 'China is breathing down on the US'. Nominal terms refers to the Chinese statistic when converted to US dollars. However, given that the Chinese currency is almost certainly badly undervalued, measuring in nominal terms will definitely undervalue the economy as a whole. PPP, on the other hand, measures in 'real terms'.

    Both forms of measurement have their flaws, so I would suggest keeping both. 118.167.233.204 (talk) 05:49, 31 March 2008 (UTC)

    [edit] Too long

    This article is way too long and could use come copyediting to be simplified. Most of the sections have their own subarticles anyways.--Kozuch (talk) 22:46, 17 April 2008 (UTC)


    [edit] Bias

    This article seems to be written from a rather anti-Communist, pro-Capitalist point of view at many times. What's more, many of the statments need more references, as the listed ones are not nearly neutral enough to stand on their own in many cases...

    Works of Sweat (talk) 15:44, 19 April 2008 (UTC)


    [edit] Inconsitancies

    This article mentions labor shortages and unemployment, high effectiveness of the population control programs and failing effectiveness of the population control programs in almost the same breath. There are some clear inconsistancies in this article, and almost all of them take a negative view of China's prospects...

    There are also some highly inconsistant parts about the use of commodities normally used to produce animal feed being used to produce fuel driving UP the cost of fuel (this would actually drive DOWN the cost of fuel) *possibly* showing more of the same attempts of anti-biofuel trolls attempting to paint the worst possible picture of biofuels, even if this means making illogical and inconsistent statements about the effects of biofuel production (or possibly just showing a lack of understanding on the part of the writers of these inconsistent statemnts).

    Works of Sweat (talk) 16:04, 19 April 2008 (UTC)