Talk:Economy of Antarctica
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
I would like to request a Tourism of Antarctica article, but I don't know where I would. I posted this message on the Antarctica talk page too. Theaterfreak64 00:44, Feb 19, 2005 (UTC)
- I would agree that a Tourism of Antarctica article would be useful, unless someone can point me in the direction of another one ....... --DTR 12:06, 30 December 2005 (UTC)
[edit] Fair use rationale for Image:Moneyantr.jpg
Image:Moneyantr.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is other other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 23:55, 5 June 2007 (UTC)
[edit] "119,898 metric tons"
A "metric ton" is a tonne. It is only ever said "metric tonne" in the US and UK because ton and tonne sound too similar and it may be necessary to distinguish between the two in some situations. In the UK however it is almost always a tonne that is being referred to. I have amended the page to correct this, but if anyone has any objections let them be known. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.111.162.127 (talk) 23:30, 18 February 2008 (UTC)