Talk:Eboracum
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
 |
This article is part of WikiProject Archaeology, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to archaeology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion. | |
| Start | This article has been rated as Start-Class on the assessment scale. | |
| ??? | This article has not yet received an importance rating on the assessment scale. | |
 |
Eboracum is within the scope of WikiProject Yorkshire, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to Yorkshire on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can visit the project page, where you can join the project, see a list of open tasks, and join in discussions on the project's talk page. | |
| Start | This article has been rated as Start-Class on the Project's assessment scale. See comments for details. |
|
| Mid | This article has been rated as Mid-Priority on the Project's priority scale. | |
 |
This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see lists of open tasks and regional and topical task forces. To use this banner, please see the full instructions. | ||||||||||||||
| Start | This article has been rated as Start-Class on the quality scale. | ||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||
It's known to most people as a river and is called a river on the page. There's no need to add confusion. ---G.T.N. (talk) 15:04, 20 April 2008 (UTC)
- Whether or not it's a river, it doesn't need two links to Humber, one of them a redirect, within three lines. GuillaumeTell 17:32, 20 April 2008 (UTC)
-
-
- It's not a river, and there's no need to link it repeatedly. Modest Genius talk 23:20, 26 April 2008 (UTC)
-
