User talk:Easternknight

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Welcome!

Hello, Easternknight, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome!  Deiaemeth 02:53, 19 April 2006 (UTC)

Contents

[edit] Military equipment of South Korea

Hello! Kudos to you for adding more information on the article. But could you provide source for some of the equipments you listed please? The quality of the article must be improved, and one of the things many South Korean military-related articles lack is sources and citations. Anyway, keep up the good work! Deiaemeth 07:38, 22 April 2006 (UTC)

[edit] License tagging for Image:100 5224-1 1.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:100 5224-1 1.jpg. Wikipedia gets hundreds of images uploaded every day, and in order to verify that the images can be legally used on Wikipedia, the source and copyright status must be indicated. Images need to have an image tag applied to the image description page indicating the copyright status of the image. This uniform and easy-to-understand method of indicating the license status allows potential re-users of the images to know what they are allowed to do with the images.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you need help on selecting a tag to use, or in adding the tag to the image description, feel free to post a message at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 23:04, 24 May 2006 (UTC)



[edit] Korea

Your addition for "first watermark" seems like nonsense- vandalism. But seeing your talk page filled with these image disputes, I assume that you are a dedicated Wikipedian. (Wikimachine 06:13, 3 November 2006 (UTC))

Oh no, not at all. "Korean watermark" seems more agreeable, and perfectly fine with a ref. Keep going! (Wikimachine 04:53, 4 November 2006 (UTC))

[edit] Image tagging for Image:1jjj.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:1jjj.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 06:49, 4 November 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Greetings from WangKon936

Hey EasternKnight. Thanks for the shout-out. I haven't really read any of your articles on either wiki or AllEmpires. Any you'd like to point out that's representative of your work? Take care! WangKon936 00:23, 14 February 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Michigan

Hey! You live pretty close to me. I live in Novi. Good friend100 02:58, 17 February 2007 (UTC)


[edit] Goguryeo

Because Goguryeo is a local Chinese kingdom, I am glad you asked, since most Korean is brain washed by the government propaganda. Goguryeo get Tang's permit to claim his Kingship. They use Chinese to record everything. And it is Sila asked Tang to conquer Goguryeo, and therefor Sila can unite the Korea. Before Ming dynasty, Korea never rule the north bank land of "Han" river. So please do some research not only in Korean. You will find you were cheated before. And I just read from news your government just add another 1000 years history to the textbook, but without common agreement by the scholarship. Well, congratulation. Korea now has the most significant and longest history in the world. "Awesome"! --Yeahsoo 04:28, 25 February 2007 (UTC)


Wow the above person is fucking stupid lol. - —Preceding unsigned comment added by 203.24.19.228 (talk • contribs)

[edit] Wow, who is the one that is barking now ? Huh?

Why so upset? Look at your red blooded face. It is all about scholarship and research. If you can find any ancient document said Goguryeo is Korean country, then we do not need to argue here. I can show you bunch of ancient book and how Tang emperor approved Goguryeo king of his title.Even Goguryeo history document is written in Chinese. But if you keep talking in that rude way, It is just my last word to you.--Yeahsoo 05:12, 26 February 2007 (UTC)

      • This is the first time I heard "Three Savage States", you do not need to insult the ancient people just try to depart them from China. I just provide the record from ancient Chinese book,if you can not provide, then it is none of my business. I did not say Goguryeo is backward. I heard Korea has 6000 years history. and Chinese Charactors and paper were invented by Korean. How come you do not have any documents, and have to write on wood? Man you are way too emotional, I just don't like being called "bark", but you just keep yelling at me--Yeahsoo 23:29, 26 February 2007 (UTC)

"Again you insinuate all Koreans are ultra-nationalists. " I did not. And I know not all Koreans are ultra-nationalists. but it is not my fault people get this impression. Your goverment just change history book add another 1000 years history, with no common agreement in historians. and you know how many Chinese stuff are claimed invented by Korean. please do not try to explain asif they are real, I am tired of it. See those Korean history TV serials, all Chinese are bad guys and invaders, even worse than Japanese? While, Chinese still think Korean is good friend as since ancient time. For god's sake, Ming and Qing dynasty send army to help Korea defend against Japan and did not keep army after war. Even Gogurye is silla asked Tang to conquer. If waht your gov did is not brain washing, what is it? What is Korean trying to do? Build a grant Korean, like just in your history book, half China used to be Korean territory? Tell you what, a liar will never become true, even it is repeated a thousand times --Yeahsoo 00:16, 27 February 2007 (UTC)

[edit] you can warn others

Wikipedia:Template messages/User talk namespace/Multi level details

Check the above link for warning templates. Remember that using these templates are only for violaters and not for insulting ppl. =) Good friend100 16:13, 25 February 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Image tagging for Image:Pa250074tigerpaintingguryeongs.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Pa250074tigerpaintingguryeongs.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 02:09, 26 February 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Korean Armour

Hey, got your message and reminder. I'm just not going to have time right now to help you. I'm on a despute resolution team on Koguryo and Parhae and I'm still trying to improve the Battle of Noryang article. Maybe I can help later but not now. WangKon936 22:08, 14 March 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Yang Gaesomun

I don't see it as a "Chinese vs. Korean" situation; it's one user insisting on imposing his/her view on all of the articles he/she is editing despite an absolute lack of support from ancient sources, Korean or Chinese -- and, even worse, refusing to discuss it. --Nlu (talk) 04:56, 17 March 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Minor Edits

I would recommend that you limit checking "minor edit" to simple typos. Your edit to Japanese invasions of Korea (1592-1598) was marked "minor" but was a fairly significant edit. Some people use that flag to hide vandalism, and if you make a significant edit but mark the "minor edit" flag, some people might mistakenly think you are vandalizing articles. -- wrp103 (Bill Pringle) 01:13, 2 April 2007 (UTC)

Oh Sorry, I did not know. won't make the mistake again. Jegal 01:14, 2 April 2007 (UTC)


[edit] Proceeding with the Goguryeo mediation

Hello! : )

This is Daniel Bryant and Armed Blowfish from the Mediation Committee, and as you may be aware, we are mediating the Goguryeo Mediation Committee case.

We are sending you this message as you are one of the involved parties in this dispute. Recently, a private wiki was set up for private mediation by the Mediation Committee. As noted by the Mediation Committee policy on confidentiality, mediation is confidential, and therefore the Committee has decided in this case to hold all mediation discussions in this case on the private wiki. Therefore, we need you to get an account so the case can proceed.

To request an account on the private Mediation Wiki, please click this link to email Armed Blowfish. Please include "Goguryeo" somewhere in the subject, e.g. "Private wiki account request for Goguryeo mediation", to note that this email has highest priority. If you do not have email enabled on your account and are unable to use the mail feature, please let us know on Armed Blowfish's talk page.

Thank you so much,
Daniel Bryant and Armed Blowfish (mail), 04:41, 26 April 2007 (UTC)

Would it be possible for you to do what is outlined above as soon as possible? Many of the parties are itching to begin, and it'd be great if you could get on board too. Cheers, Daniel Bryant 05:39, 4 May 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Mediation

Hello! We believe enough participants have signed up for us to begin mediation. However, if you have not yet signed up for the MediationWiki, please do so.

Those of you who have signed up can log in at the following URL using the username and password sent in your account creation email: http://www.southportbeekeepers.co.uk/medcom/index.php?title=Special:Userlogin&returnto=Goguryeo:Noticeboard

Be sure to watchlist this page, if you have not done so already, and check it regularly: http://www.southportbeekeepers.co.uk/medcom/index.php/Goguryeo:Noticeboard

There are questions for you to answer here, and you should watchlist this as well: http://www.southportbeekeepers.co.uk/medcom/index.php/Goguryeo:Opening

Thanks!





[edit] images I took 2007

Yes the images

they have been annoying me for all this time. I know I said that I would upload them but right now, I haven't any time. I'll try and upload them this week.

Sorry for the delay, the images are fairly useful. Good friend100 02:49, 25 September 2007 (UTC)



[edit] Korean Casualties

The military casualties are with the Japanese NOT Korean Army. These men are treated with contempt by Koreans, they were tratiors. It is an insult to the victims of the Japanese occupation to consider them Korean casualties. They assumed Japanese names and should be considered Japanese. As for civilian casualties, you seem to trying to pick the highest number. We need to pick the correct number, not the highest. The opinions Dower and the Korean source carry more weight than R. J. Rummell. The Korean study of the population is very clear that losses were not that significant. My question to you is why do you disregard the Korean source and pick Rummell?--Woogie10w (talk) 02:09, 4 March 2008 (UTC)

BTY, your post of 20,896 military dead and 418,000 is not backed up with a verifiable source. Where did you get those numbers? All data MUST have a verifiable source, no execeptions. --Woogie10w (talk) 02:17, 4 March 2008 (UTC)
What needs to be done is to get some data on the Communist guerrilla Army under Kim Il Sung. They were Korean soldiers and deserve mention.
I am 58 and have known Koreans most of my life, a good friend of my who is a few years older than myself remembers, as a child in 1945, people beating to death tratiors who worked for the Japanese. We can't consider them Korean casualties, they were Japanese puppets.--Woogie10w (talk) 02:29, 4 March 2008 (UTC)


This link has a lot of interesting information. Japanese Collaborators, Please Stand Up[1]It is misleading and incorrect to include the Koreans in the Japanese Army as Korean Casualties. They belong with the flag and uniform they fought for, not with Korea. --Woogie10w (talk) 13:05, 4 March 2008 (UTC)

To classify military deaths by ethnic idenity is not practical. The US had 2,653 deaths of foriegn nationals in its Army, they are American deaths. Think about it those guys were Japanese soldiers, not Koreans. Regards --Woogie10w (talk) 21:46, 4 March 2008 (UTC)

Your point was well made, Dower did not count forced labor deaths in Manchuria, but Rommel does include them in his figure. Can you read Korean? If so we need a scholary Korean source with data on WW2 losses. I took three semesters of Korean at the Korea Society here in NY. I really need to make an effort to improve my Korean. Regards --Woogie10w (talk) 01:45, 5 March 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Fair use rationale for Image:Mb_0334.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:Mb_0334.jpg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use. Suggestions on how to do so can be found here.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? Rettetast (talk) 22:59, 19 April 2008 (UTC)