Talk:East Jutland metropolitan area

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Er der ikke nogen der kan ligge et billede af de 17 kommuner på siden markeret med rødt ligesom kommunerne er markeret, det vil give en bedre forståelse af hvad det er for et område der er tale om.

This is like declaring that Norfolk and Suffolk form a single city, and they are two of the more rural counties in England. Luwilt (talk) 04:31, 3 March 2008 (UTC)

to Luwilt, you can not make a reference to england, england i one of the most densely populated areas in the world, denmark is not, The east jutland metropolitan area is very densely populated in danish terms in comparison to other danish areas as North jutland or vest jutland. It is the danish state there has declered that east jutland is not one single city but one big city area, and this area is whitout any doubt the most growing in population, in making new jobs, and so on. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 62.243.176.101 (talk) 17:18, 27 May 2008 (UTC)

"East Jutland metropolitan area (Byregion Østjylland), The Danish state has declared that Denmark now has 2 city areas with more than 1 million inhabitants, that is the official status according to environment minister Troels Lund Poulsen ([1]). Now the first meetings between the cities and the Danish state has begun to find a broad corporation and a common identity. Now the area has to decide how it can grow to one metropolis to rival the Copenhagen area. Some cities has not yet grown together and they probably never will because the Danish state will protect the green areas so it not will grow into a new Danish "Los Angeles"." Horrible, horrible, amateurish use of the English language... —Preceding unsigned comment added by 213.162.224.202 (talk) 00:52, 8 June 2008 (UTC)

Actually, this entire article is marred by poor grammar, to say the least. This suggests that one single individual has authored the entire article, and very few, if any, have bothered to amend it. The language flow could also be improved. Spelling is ok, but generally, this article is of very poor quality, and clearly sub-standard for an encyclopedia. The reference to "Los Angeles" is just plain silly, and makes little sense. The tone and spin of the article is almost megalomanian. Regards, Erik, Norway —Preceding unsigned comment added by 213.162.224.202 (talk) 00:58, 8 June 2008 (UTC)