Talk:East 233rd Street (Bronx)

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Good article East 233rd Street (Bronx) has been listed as one of the Engineering and technology good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can delist it, or ask for a reassessment.
An entry from this article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know? column on November 11, 2007.
December 2, 2007 Good article nominee Listed
Flag of New York City
NYC Portal

This article is part of WikiProject New York City, an effort to create, expand, and improve New York City-related articles to Wikipedia feature-quality standard.

Bulletin: The next New York City meetup is Sunday June 1st.
Good article GA This article has been rated as GA-Class on the quality scale.
Low This article has been rated as low-importance on the importance scale.
This article is within the scope of the U.S. Roads WikiProject, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to roads in the United States. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.
Topics New York State routes
Good article GA This article has been rated as GA-Class on the quality scale. (add assessment comments)
Low This article has been rated as low-importance on the importance scale.
This article needs a map. Please work with the Maps task force to create and add a map to this article.
This article is within the scope of the U.S. Streets WikiProject, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to streets in the United States. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.
Good article GA This article has been rated as GA-Class on the quality scale. (add assessment comments)
Low This article has been rated as low-importance on the importance scale.

[edit] Good article review

GA review (see here for criteria)
  1. It is reasonably well written.
    a (prose): See above b (MoS): See above notes.
  2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.
    a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
  3. It is broad in its coverage.
    a (major aspects): b (focused):
  4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    a (fair representation): b (all significant views):
  5. It is stable.
  6. It contains images, where possible, to illustrate the topic.
    a (tagged and captioned): b lack of images (does not in itself exclude GA): c (non-free images have fair use rationales):
  7. Overall:
    a Pass/Fail:
Another great job, Mitch. Redlinks seem to be fixed. Maxim(talk) 17:04, 2 December 2007 (UTC)