Talk:Earthbending

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Nickelodeon Portal

Earthbending is a part of WikiProject Nickelodeon, an attempt to better organize articles about or mostly related to Nickelodeon.

This article has been rated as B-Class on the quality scale.

Mid

This article has been rated as Mid-Importance on the importance scale.

Television Portal

This article is part of WikiProject Television, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to television programs and related subjects on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.

This article has been rated as B-Class on the quality scale.

This article is supported by the Avatar: The Last Airbender task force. (rated as Mid importance)

Assessment comments

I think we're confusing Earthbending with Firebending here. Earthbending does not rely on SHEER strength alone, it has many strong defenses. Firebending is the one with virtually almost no defense, but instead relys on it's heavy offense as it's defense.

I just don't want to diverge overmuch from the import of the official site. "Exeptionally muscular Earthbenders use their strength to overpower opponents." From a more editorial standpoint, I don't think by mentioning their great strength, we're saying it's sheer strength alone, just that strength's the prominent characteristic of their battle strategy, even in defensive manevers. (Levitating giant rocks and holding them there as shields! :P) Nor does strength necessarily mean "purely offensive." Remember the preceding sentence does mention balance of offensive and defensive maneuvers. Actually, in the case of Firebenders, I think it's more fierce intensity and focus than strength, judging by their style of focused barrage.--Buinne 05:06, 19 March 2006 (UTC)

"Judge me by my size will you?" -- Yoda H2P 04:42, 5 June 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Symbol

In The Earth Kingdom and the Avatar State we constantly see a symbol of a circle with a square in it. Is this not the symbol of Earthbenders?

No its happens to be the symbol of the Earth Kingdom as a whole. The simple of the style of bending is different.

[edit] Ferrokinetics/Magnetism

I don't understand how the assumption can be made that Earthbenders climb walls by magnetizing their limbs. Although I do not know when an Earthbender has ever climbed up a wall, I do not think that any form of magetism would be involved as they cannot influence metal. Instead, it would be more logical to assume that they are 'pulling'-for lack of a better term, on the rock with their Bending abilities.

Comes from the Avatar website at Nick, we're just going off that H2P 06:15, 27 June 2006 (UTC)

Oh, I did not know that; the website would probably be cannon, then? Although it does seem contradictory-unless only certain Earthbenders can affect magnetism...--Romuluscrohns 17:07, 27 June 2006 (UTC)

Did it state specificly that they used magnetism, or it did it just mention them climbing up walls?--Romulus 03:10, 30 June 2006 (UTC)

It seems very, very contradictory for Earthbenders to have ferrokinetic abilities and no ability to bend metal. At the very least the presence of such abilities would suggest that there could be a Metalbending specialty, just as Sandbenders specialize in sand, Waterbenders can specialize in living matter (Foggy Swamp style), and Firebenders can learn to use lightning. --Sean Patrick Santos 01:19, 29 September 2006 (UTC)

Hey, speaking of magnetism, I HIGHLY doubt that the dai li's gloves are operated via ferrokinetics. It just makes no sense. They control them the same way they control levitating rocks, by bending itself. To magnetize things that you intend to shoot at someone and manipulate into grabbing them is pointless, and it's definitely not enough to cause the gloves to open and release.—Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.61.200.253 (talk)

In the magnetism section it says that each kind of bending has a sub-skill. That is not true, there's no known Airbending sub-skill, unless someone considers the way Aang pulled his staff in the pilot a form of pyschokinesis. The opening phrase must be changed.

Just because it hasn't been shown doesn't mean there isn't one. I'm pretty sure the sub-skill came from a statement by one of the creators or Sifu but I can't remember exactly. I'll go digging for the source again. H2P ^{(Yell at me for what I've done)} 15:10, 27 November 2006 (UTC)

I still am not convinced that Earthbenders can become magnetic. Climbing up a wall or sticking to the ceiling can be accomplished by wearing gloves and shoes of earth as demonstrated by the Dai Li; they are merely pulling the rock towards them (and in the process, being pulled back). The opposite effect was shown in Bitter Work when Aang tried to move a boulder with Earthbending but he pushed away instead. Does the site (which I cannot access easily because I have dial-up) specifically say that Earthbenders can affect magnetism or does it just state that they can climb up walls?

Yes. H2P ^{(Yell at me for what I've done)} 01:25, 28 November 2006 (UTC)

As for the 'sub-bending'; water benders doe not bend living matter, but the water inside of it (and through extension, the Chi using the water), Sandbenders are realy jsut Earthbenders with a different style due to lack of most types of Earth (other than sand, which they obviously use). Metalbending most likely does not exist, as it would not fit in with the themes presented so far and they fit with the four Bending Arts. Lightning is not so much a different type of firebending, as it seems (based on Iroh's explanations) that it is merely a 'pure' form of Firebending. It gives the impression that are in fact manipulators of energy, with heat (and fire) being the easiest and simplest form of expressing it. Long story short; it does not really seem like there are any sub-types, so much as variations on the same core skills and abilities. If someone could possibly post a quote from the Nick site it would be greatly appreciated and I'm not trying to disagree, just help clarify things? I'm wondering also if we can trust all oof the Nick site info as being cannon if they do actaully state that Earthbenders are ferrokinetic. --Romulus 00:54, 28 November 2006 (UTC)

Okay, let's just clear this up, has there been any on-screen information to imply any sort of magnetic ability on the part of the Earthbenders? Any at all? Simply clinging to a vertical surface is not an implication of magnetic ability, since they're clinging to stone walls/ceilings (Which Earthbenders can control) and wearing stone gloves/boots (Which Earthbenders can also control). As people have mentioned here on this very talk page, for all we know they were just bending their boots and holding them in place against the wall, just like Aang bends air against his glider to make himself fly; he's not bending gravity or anything like that.

The only off-screen information I've seen has been a few of the special features on the Book 1 DVD's, and I haven't even watched every one yet, so I've not seen any creator commentary or interview discussing magnetism, and maybe I'm just missing something, but if all that counts as canon is what you see on screen, then we've seen no magnetism. Does the Nick website really count as canon, cause if not, then magnetism doesn't have a leg to stand on.

I'm going to put a tag on the main page noting that its only been mentioned on the web-page and hasn't been seen on the show, because otherwise it still hasn't really been in the show yet. JBK405 03:50, 28 November 2006 (UTC)

New issues.

There are only two links at the bottom of this page, I followed both, and neither one mentioned magnetism. At all. One links to a video clip that also came with the DVD, the martial arts consultant explaining where Earthbending came from, and the other linked to an interview with the same guy. I also read other interviews on that page, including the directors. Magnetism is nowhere to be found.

Now maybe it's somewhere else on the Nickelodeon web-site, or some other place, but that's not listed as a source. All we have are these two links, and it's not there or in the show. Where did this come from? JBK405 20:59, 30 November 2006 (UTC)

From Nick.com: "Earthbenders also posses the ability to 'magnatize' thier limbs, allowing them to scale shear walls and cliffs." H2P ^{(Yell at me for what I've done)} 01:57, 1 December 2006 (UTC)

Okay, people are still adding back the information saying that the Dai Li control their gloves through magnetism and that Toph's rock-armor was also magnetic, and they say say that the creators confirmed that at PMX.

Now, I have reverted that once again, but this time only because I have no way to verify that information since they didn't actually give a source on the main page (Meaning there's no link to a transcript of whatever the creators aid, no link to a video clip, no description of the newspaper article it was reported in, or anything else like that). For whoever put that information back, I will stop reverting it as soon as you present the source. A link, a newspaper article date and page number, just give us something to check and I'll stop bothering. JBK405 15:57, 4 December 2006 (UTC)

There have been references to Metalbenders in the show. In the Drill Aang says "What I would give to be a metalbender" I think that it is an actual bending type. 222.70.60.142 01:52, 20 July 2007 (UTC)

Yes, Metalbending is a real form of Earthbending; Toph uses it in the Book Two finale. JBK405 21:18, 22 July 2007 (UTC)

It is explicitly shown that she is achieving this by recognizing the presence of earth within the metal-- which Guru Pathik states is just refined earth --and bending that. It is also never referred to as "metalbending"; Aang's fanciful comment is the only occurence of the term in the series. Lucky number 49 01:23, 23 July 2007 (UTC)

In the episode "The Runaway" at around 16-17 minute mark Katara uses the term "metalbend" when discussing with Toph the scam they're going to pull. SteveG (talk) 19:07, 30 December 2007 (UTC)

Also true. Why are we going over this? JBK405 01:39, 23 July 2007 (UTC)

Because, as my points demonstrate, there is no basis for claiming the existence of "metalbending" as a valid description of what Toph does. Huu's use of waterbending to manipulate the moisture in plants isn't woodbending or plantbending, why should Toph's use of earthbending to manipulate the raw earth in refined metal be referred to as metalbending? Until there's official word, it's speculative and should be kept out of the article. Lucky number 49 01:52, 23 July 2007 (UTC)

No, I disagree. It's not speculative that she was bending the metal, as we saw it with our own eyes. Metalbending, is only a sub-skill of earthbending, because she used the earth to bend the metal. I think that metalbending is a perfectly valid description for what Toph does, no matter if she was really bending the earth inside it or not. Bagpipeturtle 02:04, 23 July 2007 (UTC)

Also true...again. We've gone over all this already, the article specifically mentions that Toph is just bending the small bits of Earth remaining in the metal, it's not a new bending style, and is not claimed to be. JBK405 01:57, 23 July 2007 (UTC)

Then why do you say above that "Metalbending is a real form of Earthbending"? Why make this statement if it has been resolved that it is inaccurate? Lucky number 49 02:01, 23 July 2007 (UTC)

Because I was generalizing since I did not feel specifics were necessary, since this conversation (Which had been dead for quite a while now) was restarted without any new info, just restating what had already been said. Metalbending exists as a form of Earthbending, but in the same way as sandbending, merely as a new style of the same art (Here's where you might be getting confused, it's a new style of Earthbending, not a new style of Bending in general). However, even though it's not a new Bending style or something else as whacky, it does exist, so it should be called what it is. JBK405 02:38, 23 July 2007 (UTC)

[edit] 'Puppet Mastery'

Shouldn't the 'Puppet Mastery' topic be a subtopic under techniques?

You mean "blood-bending", probably. And yes...probably. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 141.157.246.149 (talk) 21:57, 9 November 2007 (UTC)

... on the waterbending page. Ub3rn008 (talk) 10:05, 30 November 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Metalbending

You're going to be needing a Metalbending section beneath Sandbending, it seems to be an advanced Earthbender technique. --69.136.111.100 17:41, 2 December 2006 (UTC)

Which only Toph can do. A slight mention of it should be enough. H2P ^{(Yell at me for what I've done)} 19:56, 2 December 2006 (UTC)

It is far from cannon to say that Toph bends using only the trace elements of earth in metal. The imagery suggests something like this, but this version of the article goes too far. It's just as rational to assume that she can bend metal without earth or crystal impurities. 66.41.66.213 05:59, 9 December 2006 (UTC)

I agree with the above poster; in this Earthbending article, and in the article on Toph, and where mentioned in episode articles, it is consistently, and I believe, incorrectly, stated that Toph bends metal because of the trace elements "leftover" of earth still contained in metal. I think that this explanation oversteps what may be logically derived from watching Avatar- I can not recall it ever being explicitly mentioned by any character in any episode that is specifically (and only) the PRESENCE of TRACE elements of EARTH in metal that allows metal to be bent (by Toph)! If this gets reference again, there should be a citation referencing where in the episodes the basis for this line of reasoning comes from, or the reasoning should be removed to the discussion page.

Besides, EARTH is composed of both organic material AND inorganic matter (SOME of which certainly would fall under the category of "metals" in the periodic table). Maybe (and unlike others here, I am not assuming this is the correct (or even only) explanation) Earthbenders find it harder to concentrate on one individual kind of element within Earth when bending?

Anyhow, here is the basis for my line of reasoning: Guru Pathik's discussion on Illusion with Aang suggests that more complicated or sophisticated bending of an element comes from a deeper understanding of the element, and its connection to everything else in the world. Perhaps for the majority of Earth, Fire, Water or Air benders, bending the obvious form of their element is easy; but perceiving and bending the not-so-obvious forms of their element requires more training, and probably a correspondingly greater exertion of their will. Hamma's demonstration on advanced waterbending techniques in the episode The Puppetmaster also suggests this.Draiden 01:50, 3 November 2007 (UTC)

I agree. The whole metalbending ideology is to show the unity in the universe and expose the illusion of separation. Even though the visual in the episode shows Toph "seeing" particles of earth, that does not neccessarily mean that she can't bend the metal surrounding it. She can use the unrefined earth as an amplifier, seeing as that's what she is familiar with.

And in response to "no airbending sub-skill", I think it may be appropriate to cite Aang's thermokinetic control over things connected with air. (i.e. to break bumi's chains) —Preceding unsigned comment added by 206.174.82.232 (talk) 05:07, 7 November 2007 (UTC)

Hi all. In the most recent episode "The Day of Black Sun (part 2)," there is some evidence that some metals cannot be bent. I recently made an anonymous edit that was reverted that included the evidence with proper citations of the episode, which I reproduce here:

In theory, if a metal object were smithed in such a way that it contained few enough impurities, Toph would not be able to bend it. For instance, in the episode "The Day of Black Sun Part 2: The Eclipse," Toph can be seen testing the metal door guarding the entrance to the Firelord's underground bunker. Toph knocks on the metal and listens to the resultant sound, testing its composition based on the vibrations it makes. She then states that the door is "Not a problem," and proceeds to bend it apart. Such dialog implies that purer metals lacking significant earth content cannot be bent.^[1]

If Toph could bend ANY metal without regard to its composition, why would she bother to knock on it first and listen to its sound? Why would she even declare it to be "Not a problem"? The actions and dialog of Toph don't make sense if it assumed that ALL metals can be bent, whether or not the metal contains trace amounts of earth. In essence, it implies that SOME metal objects can or do "pose a problem."

You are drawing a false conclusion. The notion that some metals are harder to bend than others need not simply be due to the presence of trace earth impurities. It could also simply be that stronger metals are harder to bend. We don't know yet. What we do know is that Guru Pathik says just as Toph is learning to metalbend that metal is just another part of earth that has been refined and purified. SteveG (talk) 13:56, 29 December 2007 (UTC)

Unfortunately, the person who reverted the above change also did so anonymously, which is not terribly helpful in discussing the above scene. Their comment however, states:

Assuming you've been here long enough, what with you going ahead and doing that much editing and all, when has this place ever accepted theories?

I'm not sure what exactly this person means by that, since a "theory" is a verifiable claim based on explicit evidence... not sure what they're specifically objecting to. Please advise. Haricotvert (talk) 09:39, 5 December 2007 (UTC)

Wikipedia does accept theories published in reliable sources. The problem here is that this is your theory. You've made a very good argument which makes sense, using evidence from the show. But Wikipedia still can't include that argument, because the argument itself was not published by a reliable source. It could be that the Toph's whole show of testing the door was just the writers' way of making her that much more badass, and means nothing in terms of the metalbending ability in general. Until and unless a reliable source points out the possibilities implied by the scene, we can't. If, say, in an upcoming episode Toph tested Sokka's sword and said "You did a good job making this. It's too pure for me to bend," that would be explicit proof that not all metals can be bent. --Herald Alberich (talk) 19:45, 5 December 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Bumi

Bumi told Aang that he needs to find a teacher that can "see" Earth. Even though Bumi wasn't blind, could this mean that his mastery of Earthbending discovered a way to "see" Earth in a way like Toph? 72.154.89.221 14:11, 13 December 2006 (UTC)

Bumi said Aang's teacher needed to listen to the earth, not see it, which is why Aang got Toph to be his teacher (Since all she does is listen). JBK405 15:17, 13 December 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Dai Li

The fighting style of the Dai Li should be listed here. --69.136.111.100 21:31, 7 January 2007 (UTC)

Feel free to add it.--Fyre2387 ^{(talk • contribs)} 22:09, 7 January 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Magnetism

At the very end of that section, there is a mention of an "original concept". There is, however, no reference or link made to that "original concept". There is no other source mentioned. So someone please point me towards where the word "magnetism" was specifinally used by the creators as an earthbending skill.

Without that, the concept of "magnetism" is complete cruft and shouldn't be used to describe the act of earthbending in any situation.

Katara was capable of engulfing herself in water just like Toph did with rocks in Bitter Work. Yet we aren't stating that Katara does so by magnetism. Katara used water to bring a fish towards her in the very first episode of the show, just like the Dai Li use their rock gloves to bring people to them. We still didn't say that Katara used magnetism.

Furthermore, it's been stated in the Nick site (Episode Lake Laogai, Gears & More section, Rock Gloves) and by director Giancarlo Volpe at the San Diego Comicon 2006 (seen in the video "Tour of Ba Sing Se" available here) that the Dai Li don't use magnetism to climb and scale rock walls - they merge their gloves with the earth using earthbending, allowing them to climb and stand.

Metal-less earth is as magnetic as metal-less water. Ions and anything else that might factor into it can be present in both soil and lakes. It's really quite pointless to try and argue that the earthbenders must be doing those feats by magnetism, while the waterbenders are not. Unless, as I mentioned, there is indeed a true reference that can be cited. Otherwise, real-life science shouldn't be used to explain fictional magical phenomena.

I'm proposing removal of that section entirely, and a rewording of its content to be placed into the "Tecniques" section without using the word "magnetism".

So, once again, show me where I can find this "orignal concept" that is mentioned and I'll properly reference the section. Otherwise, it needs to go. Sage of Ice 23:57, 20 January 2007 (UTC)

sigh* Once again, and I swear this is like the 14th time, magnetism is mentioned as a skill on Nick.com/Avatar, Avatar's official homepage. H2P ^{(Yell at me for what I've done)} 06:52, 21 January 2007 (UTC)

Except that they use the word 'magnetize' just like that - in quotations. Putting a word in quotations like that means that its true meaning isn't being used literally (you can see that for yourself here. At best, it is meant to be taken as a metaphor, a way to visualize the ability. It certainly does not state that magnetism (direct, without quotes, literal) is a skill of the earthbender, nor does it try to use the concept of magnetism to explain the science behind earthbending. Which is exactly what this article is trying to say, and is erroneous in doing so.

Therefore, giving magnetism its own section, and stating so much about it, is sloppy. At the very most the whole section should be merged with "Techniques" and reworded to included the word 'magnetize' in quotations, just like Nick.com did. Once again, there is a huge difference between 'magnetize' and magnetize. Sage of Ice 20:32, 21 January 2007 (UTC)

M'kay the little Earth scroll thingie says the same thing about magnetism and even provides a picture of a female bender scaling a cliff (and they way she does it, the guy who made Spiderman should sue, again) as for that Dai Li and "orginal concept" stuff, it all was provided by Mike and Bryan at the PMX (Pacific Media Expo) convention. Huh, "You'd think fans of the series would know about their ...con panel." Did you see what I did? Okay, awesome. ~71.163.76.189 21 January 2007 (UTC)

Yes, I see exactly what you did, you misused a quote of mine to attempt an insult. You see, when I said that, I *knew* what I was talking about. But I digress... If you were to have read what I said before you replied you would have seen:

a) That I already mentioned the "scroll thingy" on Nick.com. So look up and read. I'll give you a hint: quotation marks.

b) I already covered the Dai Li scaling the walls. And I didn't say they couldn't do it, I just said it wasn't through magnetism.

Let's move on then. The "original concept" shown at PMX... are you referring to the one question that was asked? Because there was no "concept" there, it was just Mike and Bryan talking about the Dai Li and their style. They mentioned nothing concrete about magnetism. Feel free to provide me with a link to prove me wrong, however, as I always welcome more factual information. In other words, I want the link that reveals this: "The original concept was that most Earthbenders could use some form of magnetism, but it has since been altered to be a higher level elemental sub-skill technique that only a few can perform."

Provide me with that link/reference, and I'll be happy.

Also, while you're looking for that link, feel free to also provide the links which state the following:

"Each of the four bending disciplines contain a special sub-skill unique only to certain members of the element."

Try to keep things civil. I'll mention it once again: I fully believe that Earthbenderns are capable of doing what is described in the Magnetism section, hell, we've all seen them do it. I just do NOT see anything that states that they do it through ACTUAL magnetism.

Once again.... "magnetize" =/= magnetize. Understand the grammar here. Sage of Ice 22:14, 21 January 2007 (UTC)

To make things as clear as possible: Until there is concrete evidence that the word magnetism (unquoted and literal) is used to describe those feats of earthbending, we should remove that section and reword the information into the "Fighting Style" section. The word "magnetize" (in quotations and metaphorically, as seen on Nick.com) can then be used to describe what the act RESEMBLES, as opposed to what it IS. Sage of Ice 22:26, 21 January 2007 (UTC)

Whoa there, I think some clarification is called for. But seriously, I wasn't insulting you, I was just playing around, hence the use of quotes and the "Did you get it? ...awsome" bit. I kinda don't have any reason to be insulting you. Though I suppose this kinda stuff can be quite difficult to illustrate or personify simply with text. Next, when I said "scroll thingie" I was referring to the Lost Scroll for Earth which featured a female Earthbender scaling a cliff in a manner that echoed Spider-man, right down to the fingertips (lawsuit, I also forgot to hyphenate). The "other" scroll thingie for the four bending arts on Nick.com doesn't feature any illustrations. As for the PMX. Mike and Bryan stated that it was indeed magnetic control and that that originally the early concept was that most if not all Earthbenders could perform it (hence why it was put on the Nick site over 2 years ago) but it has since been altered to a higher level that only a few can do (much like lightning). They went on to say that each element has a greater and lesser form to it that forms a sort of balance (lightning for fire, healing for water, and apparently magnetism for earth; the balancer for airbending is still a mystery). A whole mess of dudes speculate that its sound (with plenty of "science" to back it up) or something but even as a science-y person myself, I'd just rather wait until they give us something (or rather make something up). As we've seen and know by now, balance is a pretty big thing in this show. 22 January 2007 (UTC)

Hmmm... interesting. Someone really needs to put that stuff up on the internet so that I can read it, as it sounds like a good read. Also, I need to find a store that sells those Lost Scrolls... in Canada; the more information the better.

All that having been said, I like the general concept. I long since noticed that fire and water had those subskills, I just didn't think it was a concept they were deliberately trying to acheive with all elements, though I was hopeful. However, if what you say is true about their statements at PMX, then I find myself quite ecstatic about their vision. I had originally thought, though, that the earth subskill was metal. Even though it's apparently just earth impurities and not really the metal.... which brings me to my next point:

If they have magnetic control then... does that mean they're supposed to be capable of bending metal without having to rely on earthly impurities? Cause it seems to make logical sense when you think about what magnetism is more connected with.

As a final thought I will say that I share the same feeling as the others about "sound". It was what I orginally thought as well, also being a scientific person.

Well, thanks for enlightening me, hopefully I'll come across a full transcript of PMX one day to see what Bryan and Mike had to say. Sage of Ice 04:38, 23 January 2007 (UTC)

I've removed the Magnetism section from the page (again) because, regardless of whether or not the information is accurate (And at this point I've stopped trying to figure out if it is or isn't), Wikipedia clearly states that only verified information is to be displayed. The magnetism section only had references to two episodes of the series and, though it certainly may have been magnetism, neither episode said or did anything to imply that it actually was. I freely admit that the Nickelodeon Avatar web-page does mention magnetism, so it does exist, and I personally added its information to the article, but it is only a single sentence that includes nothing on armor or distant control, and makes no mention of a skill unique to each bending art. As such, until a book, interview, web-page, etc. can be presented as a source for information on Magnetism, it should remain out of the article. No source, no submitting. JBK405 04:00, 28 February 2007 (UTC)

[edit] pictures

Do we need 2 pictures of earth kingdom soliders bending at the top of the page, could'nt we just have 1 Tremewanbill 04:18, 31 January 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Jing or Nèi Jìng?

ok, so i was looking at this article and during the talk about the Jing, it gives a link. i followed the link i found that that there are several forms of Jing. i looked at what looked as the most relevant one, that said it dealt with a principle in martial arts. that article, however is about the essence in the body, such as kidney essence or semen. is this really the Jing they are talking about? I followed a link from that article that said not to be confused with the 'related concept of jìn (勁; power)'. the link for Nèi Jìng (Nèi Jìn) is about internal power in martial arts, so is this a more accurate link to use when talking about Jìng? Jing[[1]] Nèi Jìng[[2]] Monk3 06:49, 6 February 2007 (UTC)

Unfortunately, the series doesn't show the actual character used for Jing. Given the context of the show and the description of Jing used in the show itself, I think it's safe to assume that the correct usage of the term is Jìng (勁; power). That said, I'm editing the article to have the link point to the Nèi Jìng page. If there are any objections, please discuss them here. Thank you. Hraefn (talk) 08:06, 5 December 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Question

Is it possible to Earthbenders to bend salt? Has there been any reference in the show about bending the salt out of the water so they could defend themselves while in the sea, like desalinizing the water? Just a theory. 201.17.66.231 16:02, 8 February 2007 (UTC)

I don't think there has been reference to this before,and it would probably have to be a fairly high amount of salinity in the water, so like a sea or an ocean. I don't know, though, because normally Earthbenders would have a strong connection with the earth to bend it, and in water, I'm not sure how strong of a connection they would have. Monk3 03:27, 12 February 2007 (UTC)

It is probably possible, but we havent seen anything too similar to it in the show, so it shouldn't be added to the page. Bagpipeturtle 03:58, 12 February 2007 (UTC)

Probly only sandbenders would beable to bend salt. Anubiz 15:55, 28 April 2007 (UTC)

Why only the sandbenders? It can be argued that they wouldn't have the same dificulty due the loose nature of sand, but it would be wrong to say only they can bend it. If it's possible, all Earthbenders have to potential to do it. It's like metalbending, only Toph is able to do it because of her earth awareness, but if there was other character who is as aware of earth as she is (maybe Bumi), I have no doubt they could bend metal as well. 201.37.30.83 00:09, 7 July 2007 (UTC)

There is an example. Toph bent the slurry water in the drill episode, so I'm sure the same applies for saltwater bending. I think the theory is correct, but lacks enough sources.--TriCheeseSorrow (talk) 14:38, 13 February 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Huh?

Why is it that when an earthbender earthbends a rock out of the ground but there is no hole or anything where the rock was recently taken from? (Whats a question? 23:13, 2 March 2007 (UTC))

I'm pretty sure that's just an oversight in the animation process; episodes twoards the end of season two have actually shown the holes, indicating that they will be drawn from know on.--Romulus 01:42, 8 March 2007 (UTC)

Okay. I didn't notice. Thanx for the input. 65.34.72.52 12:32, 8 March 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Rock Candy?

...How did King Bumi bend the rock candy (creeping crystals)? Is rock candy made of actual rock? Because I dont see how he could bend rock CANDY. Confusion a side dont you think this should be mentioned in the artical? 65.34.72.52 19:58, 3 March 2007 (UTC)

If there is a mineral used in the growth of the creeping crystal, it would be possible, but I doubt that it's a major issue.--Romulus 01:42, 8 March 2007 (UTC)

Well, Of course it's not. I was just curious. Although, candybending is more powerful than you know! Muhahahahahahaa! -65.34.72.52 00:08, 12 March 2007 (UTC)

Maybe, in the Avatar World, rock candy is really made of rock. I'm pretty sure there isn't such thing as "candybending," though. I woudln't read too much into it. Bagpipeturtle 21:46, 12 March 2007 (UTC)

How is bending sugar any real different than bending sand? H2P ^{(Yell at me for what I've done)} 23:22, 12 March 2007 (UTC)

Sugar is organic.--Romulus 06:30, 21 March 2007 (UTC)

Sugar is made from sugarcane, not actual rock. Bagpipeturtle 03:19, 22 March 2007 (UTC)

Dang... I expected this section to be long deleted... guess not... anyways, isnt plant considered to be a part of the element earth? So why wouldnt they be able to bend sugarcane or wood for that matter? Whats a question? 01:51, 31 March 2007 (UTC)

Uh, no. Wood is not considered to be part of the earth element. Wood is not one of the elements used in Avatar, it is part of a five- or six-element model. Avatar uses a four-element model (hence the Four Nations). Have you ever seen an earthbender bending wood in the show? No. If any benders were to manipulate plants such as sugarcane or sugar beets, it would be waterbenders, because of the water concentrated within the plants. Not earthbenders. They bend rock, not plants. Bagpipeturtle 04:15, 31 March 2007 (UTC)

Just some technical thingns that don't really matter, since sugar is organic, it contains carbon, which the earthbenders were bending (coal) in that prison episode. Also, all the bendings are the same according to the Guru guy. I'm pretty sure that a bender would be able to bend anything in the universe if focused enough, including candy, but that is speculation. If you want references, I'll get my science book and go look up the episode. I don't mean that in a smart aleck tone, by the way.--TriCheeseSorrow (talk) 14:38, 13 February 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Notable Earthbenders

To be quite honest, Haru and the Terra Team aren't really all that notable. The terra team for previously discussed reasons. While Haru, not counting the lackluster videogame or that cute little short (where his long gone VA was replaced with a goat), the poor one-shot guy has only appeared once in a pretty standalone episode. Even in terms of the show universe thingie he's practically just some random commoner. It would seem as though we're puttin down every Earthbender that comes our way. Though neccessary in the first season as we weren't treated to all that many, but with ya'know "Book 2 Earth" and the good thousand or so (if ya count all those random guards), I think some distinctions can be made. ~Father's Wish 21 March 2007 (UTC)

I think the Terra Team should be there because they are (at least they were supposed to be) expert Earthbenders, and even though Haru had only a minor role, he was the first earthbender seen in the series, not to mention that he's the first one to earthbend on-screen. And why aren't Kuruk and Yangchen listed here? They were Avatars and therefore Earthbenders. 189.4.230.173 22:42, 25 March 2007 (UTC)

Kuruk and Yangchen were born Water and Airbenders, respectively. We can't mention them in every article, that would be repetitive. So they should be listed into the articles of their nationalities. ɱўɭĩє ^{What did I do}_wrong 04:04, 30 March 2007 (UTC)

Kinda late in the game, but uh, Bumi? ~Father's Wish 30 March 2007 (UTC)

[edit] The title

Id like to know who named this article and its sister articles. Take this article for instance, It is titled Earthbender. While the article itself is about the art of EarthbendING. The only time the article adheres to its title is in the opening sentence. Which also creates a bridge that tries to connect the title and the subject. I feel that the article should be named after its content. All thats required for this is a change in the title and the article introduction. The other bending articles should follow suit. The articles themselves would be unchanged. 72.234.46.143 14:38, 12 July 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Earthbending, or earthbending?

Is the first "e" capitolized in the middle of a sentince? Keyblade Mage 23:09, 7 September 2007 (UTC)Keyblade Mage

Its a little unclear, but based on what's found on Nick sites, probably not. Take a look at Talk:Avatar: The Last Airbender/Archive 1#Naming Style Guide for what was figured out before.--Fyre2387 ^{(talk • contribs)} 23:31, 7 September 2007 (UTC)

Thanks Fyre. Keyblade Mage 23:34, 7 September 2007 (UTC)Keyblade Mage

[edit] Tank Usage

The article currently reads "Additionally, because of their inability to bend processed metals, the bending abilities of an Earthbender can be negated by securing them within a metallic barrier, separating them from any contact with the earth (however the later seems as though it will no longer be the case, as in the third seasons trailer,earthbenders are seen "driving" large metal tanks with the earth kingdoms symbol on it."

Nothing shows that it's Earthbenders using the tanks, just Earth Kingdom people (especially as it seems that Teo is driving one, and his father IS a mechanist after all). There's no real indication that metal blocking Earthbenders' abilities will "no longer be the case." —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.40.177.127 (talk) 04:11, 23 September 2007 (UTC)

A good point, and the phrase in parentheses was speculation. I've removed it. --Herald Alberich 04:00, 24 September 2007 (UTC)

All will be revealed once The Day of Black Sun come out, but I will divulge you this: Those tanks are powered kind of like the Ba Sing Se tram. Ub3rn008 (talk) 10:25, 30 November 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Fair use rationale for Image:Sandbends+Sailer.png

Image:Sandbends+Sailer.png is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot 04:17, 29 September 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Fair use rationale for Image:Hung Gar Style2.png

Image:Hung Gar Style2.png is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

BetacommandBot 04:05, 1 October 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Meteorite

Why do people insist on remove the mention that Earthbenders can bend outer space earthly material? That particular meteorite is not "just earth". Nick's Avatar site states that due being made of a meteorite "the blade [of Sokka's sword] is very powerful and can slice through the toughest materials, including metal". Nick's site also refers to the piece of the meteorite Toph kept as "Toph's space earth bracelet", and again I'll describe it word by word: "Made from the same meteorite as Sokka's sword, Toph keeps this special earth/metal hybrid handy by disguising it as a bracelet she wears around her arm. She can bend it into any shape she wants." Clearly, it's not just earth from outer space, and it deserves being mentioned. Go to Nick's site if you want to, it's under Gear&Stuff in Sokka's Master. [3] 201.53.128.173 23:04, 14 October 2007 (UTC)

Except you just said, quoting from the website, that Toph's little bracelet, made of the meteorite, is earth and metal, and it's so hard it can cut through other metal. Nowhere does it say it is something which isn't either earth or metal. It might be extremely hard metal, and be from outer space, but nothing there says it's anything except just that: Very hard metal. JBK405 23:44, 15 October 2007 (UTC)

But the fact she can bend earth like matter from outer space sounds big enough to deserve a small mention doesn't it? 189.4.249.223 23:58, 17 October 2007 (UTC)

But again, it's not "earth like," it's earth. Nowhere does it say it is composed of material fundamentally different than any other kind of Earth. It's described as "special," but so was the water from the North Pole Spirit Oasis. It's described as an earth/metal hybrid, but so was the slurry in The Drill (Well, that was water and earth, but you get my meaning). Sure, it's not exactly the garden variety earth you'll find in a garden (You know, I never thought I'd actually get to use that figure of speech), but it's still earth. I've no objection to this being included as one of the many things an Earthebdner can bend (Like sand, rock, crystals, etc.), but not as something other than earth. JBK405 02:08, 18 October 2007 (UTC)

Even though it is earth, the fact it's from outer space sets it apart from other earths, and it showed us a previously unknown aspect of Earthbending, a small note that they're capable of bending these kinds of earth isn't much to ask and provides a quick clarification on the matter. 201.37.29.189 13:30, 21 October 2007 (UTC)

No matter where it comes from, earth is earth. Though I agree that it deserves just a little mention. Ub3rn008 (talk) 10:02, 30 November 2007 (UTC)

If it's not mentioned at all, I think it should be. It has the potential to be a plot device used by Toph, but that is probably speculation.--TriCheeseSorrow (talk) 14:38, 13 February 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Dai Li Style?

Can't we mention the techniques the Dai Li utilize? Add it under variations? with Sand and Metalbending? 216.204.100.226 16:52, 29 October 2007 (UTC) Fantasy Leader

I put this up, but someone took it down. WHY can't we have this up? It's a totally different form of Earthbending. Can someone please discuss this with me? 216.204.100.226 16:52, 13 November 2007 (UTC) Fantasy Leader

I actually tend to agree. It's not a unique technique like Metalbending is, but like Sandbending it is specialized, and used only by a particular subgroup of Earthbenders. --Herald Alberich 17:31, 13 November 2007 (UTC)

So then ... why can't we have this up? I'd like a reason. And a good one. 216.204.100.226 17:43, 13 November 2007 (UTC) Fantasy Leader

Because it isn't really a specialised style. While nobody else to date has worn rock gloves, or made it a point to shape earth into hands/fists to perform whatever actions are necessary, they all could if they wanted to; it's just a technique (Like Toph's/Aang's rock armor in Bitter Work/The Crossroads of Destiny, or Katara's surfboard in The Serpent's pass, etc) and doesn't seem to rely on anything apart from normal bending. Sandbending involves a medium which is fundamentally different from other forms of earth (loose and soft as opposed to hard and unyielding) and has evolved its own culture and style to go with it; the rock gloves is just a way to use normal earthbending, and if we listed it then we'd need to list every other technique we've seen. JBK405 06:06, 14 November 2007 (UTC)

Alright. But aren't the rock gloves part of the Dai Li culture? Just like sandbending is part of sandbending culture?71.168.85.188 22:56, 14 November 2007 (UTC) Fantasy Leader

If they had their own culture, perhaps, but they're a government agency, not a people. Think FBI/NKVD/MI-5 kinda thing. JBK405 05:15, 15 November 2007 (UTC)

Alright. I understand. 71.168.85.188 23:12, 15 November 2007 (UTC) Fantasy Leader

[edit] Dai Li chains?

The chains the Dai Li used to bind people - couldn't those possibly be made of a metal naturally occurring in the earth, such as iron, nickel, or lead? Not to say they are capable of metal bending, but I find it rather interesting they have chains, and the chains didn't appear to be just made of an average rock.--71.194.23.12 06:37, 6 November 2007 (UTC)

They are metal chains. So? JBK405 23:59, 6 November 2007 (UTC)

If they're manipulating them using bending, and by all evidence in the episode, that's really the only way they were moving them around, that could lead to the conclusion they are metal-bending.--71.194.23.12 05:27, 7 November 2007 (UTC)

Sorry, you're a bit late. We already had this whole discussion a while back, they're chain whips. It's pretty firmly established that they're not metalbending. JBK405 05:41, 7 November 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Techniques

Should we make a list of Earthbending techniques? (rock armor, etc.) 71.168.85.188 22:56, 14 November 2007 (UTC) Fantasy Leader

We've seen hundreds of different "moves" with Earthbending, we can't possibly list all of them, or even clarify what really counts as a technique; they all involve moving Earth in some fashion, what counts as a separate technique? JBK405 05:17, 15 November 2007 (UTC)

I don't know. Maybe the named ones? I was thinking about the whole Dai Li thing, as well as the techniques Aang mentioned in "Bitter Work." Or maybe those giant stone coins shown in "The Avatar State." Stuff like those. 71.168.85.188 23:12, 15 November 2007 (UTC) Fantasy Leader.

If we get enough information on the techniques then sure, it'd be great to have a catagorey, but just their names and a brief description wouldn't really fit (Then it'd really just become a list of things we've seen characters do). If we get info along the lines of what real-life martial technique inspired this bending move, what Avatar-universe thing inspired the creation of this technique, detail on how/why this move is used, etc. then it'd be a good catagorey. JBK405 (talk) 04:26, 17 November 2007 (UTC)

Alright. 71.168.85.188 (talk) 15:35, 18 November 2007 (UTC) Fantasy Leader

[edit] Bended/Bent

I is right term bended? Grammatically it should be bent, but since its refering to the Bending Arts, it might have its own grammar rules in terms of that.....Idunno. Anyone got any ideas? 76.0.95.134 17:01, 4 December 2007 (UTC)

I'd say use "bent" unless anyone can think of an instance of the show or official website saying otherwise. --Herald Alberich 20:02, 4 December 2007 (UTC)

I'm for bent. And believe that this should be applied to all avatar pages. Bended sounds awkward and childish in my opinion. Ub3rn008 (talk) 08:47, 5 December 2007 (UTC)

The show is a bit childish, Ub3rn008. I'm for 'bended'. What did Katara say when they met Haru? (Water Book). I have the first season on DVD, I'll go look it up and post back later today.--TriCheeseSorrow (talk) 14:38, 13 February 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Crystals

why isnt there anything said about crystals? ok its earth, but isnt it a bit like metalbending? ok unlike metal it is found in nature, however like metal it is a more pure form, and far more complex than your averge rock. something only the beter earthbenders can handle.??? i look forward to coments on this. Ro the Netherlands. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 83.86.255.50 (talk) 02:43, 2 January 2008 (UTC)

It is already mentioned in the article, and since the series makes no significant distinction from crystal to regular earth, I'm afraid there's nothing worth changing. 189.60.84.129 (talk) 11:39, 24 January 2008 (UTC)

[edit] In-universe

I added {{In-universe}} since big parts of the text body really lack real world "scope" or something. I don't really know anything about this, so uh, I just placed the template. MathiasRav (talk) 19:21, 24 January 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Does this really need its own article?

I hate to be "that guy", but does this really need its own article? I can't imagine it's notable, as it shows no hits on Google News or Scholar, and none of the refs are from non-primary sources.

Could the four types of bending be merged into one larger article? Already this article seems to be over-expanded - it could really stand to be trimmed and merged into a "Bending (Avatar)" or "Elemental Bending" article.

Thank you for your time.Not even Mr. Lister's Koromon survived intact. 18:05, 29 January 2008 (UTC)

I don't think that they should be merged. All four of them are different in their style, function, culture, and usage.--TriCheeseSorrow (talk) 14:38, 13 February 2008 (UTC)

This is exactly the problem - they're not real. "Having a different culture" should never even be uttered in this kind of situation - it's all just an element from a children's show. They have no notability of their own, and many parts of the four articles parallel each other - earlier, people were trying to add a "special disciplines" to the airbending article, just because the other articles had a special bending discipline. If they're so similar that you can try to expect parallels like that, they should probably be merged.Not even Mr. Lister's Koromon survived intact. 01:39, 18 February 2008 (UTC)

I'm not familiar with the word for a cartoon's culture, which is why I said culture. They all have different government, festivals, music, literature, lifestyle, painting and sculpture, theater and film and similar things. I know that they aren't real, but still. But defining the word culture really isn't the issue, I just thought I'd let you know why I used it because I felt like you attacked it. I can see your reason in wanting to merge them, and I agree. I wanted to keep them the same earlier because they were different, but I didn't see how similar they actually were. I know that what I'm saying doesn't really matter when it all comes down to it, I'm just some random guy, but I say go ahead and merge them. It'd make looking at them much more easier than opening up four different tabs to view them all. Maybe we should just have one very large Avatar:The Last Airbender page, where it gives information on the plot, bending, benders, creatures and such. Sure, it would be huge, but that's what a table of contents is for, right?--TriCheeseSorrow (talk) 17:10, 2 March 2008 (UTC)

No, I understand that it has different elements of fictional culture, but the point is that there's no real culture there - it's just something to flesh out an object that is, in the end, merely four variations of the same thing.Not even Mr. Lister's Koromon survived intact. 18:31, 2 March 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Terrakinetic, Geokinetic

Hey, I was just reading over this site, and saw Geo/Terakinetic. Could we pick only one to use? I'm sure that to some people who aren't paying attention, they would think that they are two different things. It also just doesn't seem to flow very well, but that's just my opinion.--TriCheeseSorrow (talk) 14:10, 13 February 2008 (UTC)

IMO Terrakinesis flows better(so to speak), though geokinesis is probly more accurate.23:46, 17 February 2008 (UTC)