Talk:Earshot
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
 |
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Metal, an attempt to improve articles related to heavy metal music. Please participate by visiting the project page for more details on the projects. |
| Stub | This article has been rated as Stub-class on the quality scale. |
| ??? | This article has not yet received a rating on the importance scale. |
|
The article has been rated for quality and/or importance but has no comments yet. If appropriate, please review the article and then leave comments here to identify the strengths and weaknesses of the article and what work it will need. |
|
 |
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography. For more information, visit the project page. | ||
| Stub | This article has been rated as Stub-Class on the project's quality scale. [FAQ] | ||
 |
This article is supported by WikiProject Musicians, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed biographical guide to musicians and musical groups on Wikipedia. | ||
I think that additional information about the band members like "who does/plays what" would highly improve the article. --BNutzer 21:07, 5 February 2006 (UTC)
Yea bud, I've already updated that. I think this page needs a lot more work, especially since this band is so good it deserves a good wikipedia page :) Powerpsi 01:53, 6 April 2006 (UTC)
So, is the vocalist's name Will or Wil? Since I see both versions on the page, and I can't change it myself since I don't know either...:-P Sure it's probably Will, but I want to make absolutely sure. --213.65.85.14 13:21, 25 July 2006 (UTC)
The vocalist's name is spelled Wil, with one L. Current lineup and information can be found at http://www.myspace.com/earshot.
[edit] cleanup
This is a very badly written article, it reads more like an overeager fan's review of the band as opposed to an encyclopeadic entry from a neutral standpoint. I dont know anything about the band really, but i dont think this:
"It's all here: Optimism, power, heartbreak, depression, regret, triumph.
All is within EARSHOT."
is at all appropriate, it sounds more like an advertising slogan. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Dark wounds (talk • contribs) 13:43, 18 December 2007 (UTC)
- That was the exact reason why I added those templates into the article. I probably should have stated the reasons for doing so beforehand. Djskein79 (talk) 14:18, 4 January 2008 (UTC)
-
- The article seems like it was written by a fanboy. or girl. at any rate, is EARSHOT supposed to be allcaps or what? and why so many adjectives thoughout the whole thing?
like,
"No doubt, that in the 48 minutes of listening to the bevy of infectiously memorable tracks, one can only describe this 11 song collection as a very cleverly crafted, re-defined and re-designed approach to their genre with a plethora of sonically raw and defining moments." —Preceding unsigned comment added by 172.136.92.176 (talk) 09:22, 25 May 2008 (UTC)
