Talk:Earlsdon, Coventry

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This article is within the scope of the West Midlands WikiProject, a collaborative effort to improve Wikipedia's coverage of the West Midlands. In so doing it works and collaborates with the two related projects UK Geography WikiProject and UK Subdivisions WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. Please also feel free to join in the discussions on the project's talk page.

Start This page has been rated as Start-Class on the quality scale.
Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the importance scale.

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Coventry, a collaborative effort to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Coventry. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. Please also feel free to join in the discussions on the project's talk page.

Start This page has been rated as Start-Class on the quality scale.
Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the importance scale.

Is the map needed on this page? There is a map on the Coventry page? Snowman 11:05, 18 November 2006 (UTC)


[edit] Recent Additions

Chaps, this whole article read like an advert, and a slightly pretentious one at that. Earlsdon isn't that much, with tiny terraced houses, 1960s shops, and several derelict idustrial units. I've cleaned it up a bit, and removed bits that frankly aren't needed in an encyclopaedic article. Hawker Typhoon 22:59, 10 February 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Earlsdon,Coventry

I was born and raised as a kid in Earlsdon in the 1950's and 60'and long since moved overseas. . I went to Earlsdon School and Broadway School nearby. I was fascinated to read your article and must say thankyou for its content. Keep up the good work. Regards Ian Roberts

[edit] Earlsdon flood

There was a flood in Earlsdon following heavy rainfall a few years ago. How much detail should be included in the article page? I guess that it was in the local newspaper at the time, and I wonder if any news reports could be used as references? Snowman 20:27, 27 October 2007 (UTC)

I think the bit on Royal Oak is inappropriate & keep removing it but different anons keep adding back in. Just a short sentence on the fact is appropriate unless there is something notable that can be expanded on and referenced. Keith D 21:46, 27 October 2007 (UTC)
Semi-Protected :-) Chase me ladies, I'm the Cavalry 02:55, 9 November 2007 (UTC)