Talk:Eagle River High School

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Alaska, an effort to create, expand, organize, and improve Alaska-related articles to a feature-quality standard.
Start This article has been rated as Start-class on the quality scale.
Low This article has been rated as low-importance on the importance scale.
WikiProject Schools This article is related to WikiProject Schools, an attempt to write quality articles about schools around the world. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page.
Start This article has been rated as Start-Class on the assessment scale.
Low This article has been rated as Low-Importance within Schools.

[edit] Advertisement

There are too many grammar issues to count, and this article reads like an advertisement for the school. 67.170.70.47 23:45, 8 May 2007 (UTC)

This article reads like a sports section of a student news paper little to none of what is here is acceptable for an unbiased publication. Worse yet it looks like it was thrown together without the help of an editor. Far too much is written in the themes of "I", "you", and "we." Not to mention sections which have titles and no content. It looks like this page was copied from another school, pasted, and filled in; poorly at that. 65.215.162.63 17:44, 22 September 2007 (UTC)

I couldn't agree more, so I've just thrown in the neutrality banner. Hopefully someone with some knowledge of the school can come in here and fix things up. --Mr.crabby (Talk) 01:39, 20 December 2007 (UTC)

Working on fixing this up. Might take a week though. 89AK (talk) 00:47, 21 December 2007 (UTC)89AK

Basically finished editing. Still need to find some sources for information and still need to find correct student populations. Any advice/coments would be greatly appreciated. 89AK (talk) 23:20, 21 December 2007 (UTC)89AK

I've removed the neutrality banner due to the contributions of User:89AK. The artile (as far as I can tell) is unbiased now and is very informative. --Mr.crabby (Talk) 23:50, 21 December 2007 (UTC)