Talk:Eagle Cash
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
[edit] GA Review
- Is it reasonably well written?
- A. Prose quality:
- B. MoS compliance:
- Is it factually accurate and verifiable?
- A. References to sources:
- B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary:
- C. No original research:
- Is it broad in its coverage?
- Is it neutral?
- Is it stable?
- Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
- A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:
- B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:
- Overall:
I've gone through this article, and I can find no major fault with it at all. It's well-referenced, well-written, and has no problems. It's short, but I can think of other articles that are also short, but are also GAs. So this one is a pass. Noble Story (talk) 11:03, 27 March 2008 (UTC)