User talk:Eaccess07

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Contents

[edit] Regarding your edit to Coat of Eyes:

Your recent edit to Coat of Eyes (diff) was reverted by automated bot. You have been identified as a new user or a logged out editor using a hosting or shared IP address to add email addresses, phone numbers, YouTube, Geocities, Myspace, Facebook, blog, forum, or other such free-hosting website links to a page. Please note that such links are generally to be avoided. You can restore any other content by editing the page and re-adding that content. The links can be reviewed and restored by established users. Thank you for contributing! // VoABot II 03:24, 18 January 2007 (UTC)

[edit] License tagging for Image:Drowning clip.ogg

Thanks for uploading Image:Drowning clip.ogg. Wikipedia gets thousands of images uploaded every day, and in order to verify that the images can be legally used on Wikipedia, the source and copyright status must be indicated. Images need to have an image tag applied to the image description page indicating the copyright status of the image. This uniform and easy-to-understand method of indicating the license status allows potential re-users of the images to know what they are allowed to do with the images.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you need help on selecting a tag to use, or in adding the tag to the image description, feel free to post a message at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 05:07, 18 January 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Copyright issue with Allan Bates

Hello. Concerning your contribution, Allan Bates, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from either web sites or printed material. This article or image appears to be a direct copy from http://www.allanbates.com/breif_bio.htm. As a copyright violation, Allan Bates appears to qualify for speedy deletion under the speedy deletion criteria. Allan Bates has been tagged for deletion, and may have been deleted by the time you see this message. For text material, please consider rewriting the content and citing the source, provided that it is credible.

If you believe that the article or image is not a copyright violation or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under the GFDL, you can comment to that effect on Talk:Allan Bates. If the article or image has already been deleted, but you have a proper release, you can reenter the content at Allan Bates, after describing the release on the talk page. However, for text content, you may want to consider rewriting the content in your own words. Thank you, and please feel free to continue contributing to Wikipedia. Mr Stephen 12:18, 1 February 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Copyright issue with Coat of Eyes

Hello. Concerning your contribution, Coat of Eyes, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from either web sites or printed material. This article or image appears to be a direct copy from http://profile.myspace.com/index.cfm?fuseaction=user.viewprofile&friendid=81530128. As a copyright violation, Coat of Eyes appears to qualify for speedy deletion under the speedy deletion criteria. Coat of Eyes has been tagged for deletion, and may have been deleted by the time you see this message. For text material, please consider rewriting the content and citing the source, provided that it is credible.

If you believe that the article or image is not a copyright violation or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under the GFDL, you can comment to that effect on Talk:Coat of Eyes. If the article or image has already been deleted, but you have a proper release, you can reenter the content at Coat of Eyes, after describing the release on the talk page. However, for text content, you may want to consider rewriting the content in your own words. Thank you, and please feel free to continue contributing to Wikipedia. Mr Stephen 12:26, 1 February 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Coat of Eyes

Please do not add copyrighted material to Wikipedia, as you did to Coat of Eyes. We cannot accept copyrighted material for legal reasons, as it is not compatible with the GNU Free Documentation License. Your contributions must be in your own words. Thank you. Mr Stephen 11:37, 2 February 2007 (UTC)

This is your last warning. The next time you add copyrighted material to an article, as you did to Coat of Eyes, you will be blocked from editing. Daniel.Bryant 11:39, 2 February 2007 (UTC)

Thanks for your message. Please sign your posts to talk pages with four tildes, ie ~~~~. Just to be clear; are you saying that you wrote the text at http://profile.myspace.com/index.cfm?fuseaction=user.viewprofile&friendid=81530128, you own the copyright in it, and you are willing to realease it under the GNU Free Documentation License? Mr Stephen 18:06, 2 February 2007 (UTC)

Fair enough. The following text is (mostly) from here;
"If you hold the copyright to this text and permit its use under the terms of the GNU Free Documentation License, explain this on the article's discussion page, then either display a notice to this effect at the site of original publication or send an e-mail from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en at wikimedia dot org or a postal letter to the Wikimedia Foundation. These messages must explicitly permit use under the GFDL.
Note: Articles on Wikipedia must be written from a neutral point of view and must be verifiable in reliable published sources; copyright issues aside, your text may not be appropriate for inclusion in Wikipedia."
Regards, Mr Stephen 23:30, 2 February 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Allan bates

The article Allan bates has been speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This was done because the article seemed to be about a person, group of people, band, club, company, or web content, but it did not indicate how or why the subject is notable, that is, why an article about that subject should be included in Wikipedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not assert notability may be deleted at any time. If you can indicate why the subject is really notable, you are free to re-create the article, making sure to cite any verifiable sources.

Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, and for specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. NawlinWiki 00:29, 14 March 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Coat of Eyes (again)

Hey, I'm a huge Pumpkins fan and I have no doubt about Coat of Eyes' existence or anything. It's just that they dont belong on wikipedia, according to wikipedia policy. Forums and website comment posts cannot be used as sources, even if they are recognized by you and I to be "knowledgeable" third party fans, or even the band members themselves. And besides, on principle, early projects of members of later, more memorable bands should not be getting their own articles. Even "The Marked" should probably just be a section under the Billy Corgan article, but there are a lot of sources and articles that discuss the Marked, unlike Coat of Eyes. How's this for a compromise? If Coat of Eyes is truly a precursor to The Marked, I would have no objections to putting a "Coat of Eyes" section on the Marked article. We'd still have to worry about the lack of sources, but it wouldnt need to be deleted. Just my two cents. Unfortunately, I stand by my interpretation that Coat of Eyes should not be its own article at this point. -Werideatdusk33 (talk) 04:52, 29 November 2007 (UTC)

  • Yeah, I'd be happy to integrate the Coat of Eyes article into the Marked article. We should still ahve some sources though. For them, and for the Marked. So feel free to add those you mentioned, and we'll leave it to the admin-bots to sort out whether they're valid. --Werideatdusk33 (talk) 05:12, 29 November 2007 (UTC)