Talk:Dyson series

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

WikiProject Physics This article is within the scope of WikiProject Physics, which collaborates on articles related to physics.
Stub This article has been rated as Stub-Class on the assessment scale.
??? This article has not yet received an importance rating within physics.

Help with this template This article has been rated but has no comments. If appropriate, please review the article and leave comments here to identify the strengths and weaknesses of the article and what work it will need.
This article has been automatically assessed as Stub-Class by WikiProject Physics because it uses a stub template.
  • If you agree with the assessment, please remove {{Physics}}'s auto=yes parameter from this talk page.
  • If you disagree with the assessment, please change it by editing the class parameter of the {{Physics}} template, removing {{Physics}}'s auto=yes parameter from this talk page, and removing the stub template from the article.

Is the first paragraph meant to say that the series *converge* rather than diverges? Wrath0fb0b 02:56, 28 February 2006 (UTC)


If that's the Neumann series then it's Carl Neumann, not Johnny.

Charles Matthews 08:23, 19 February 2006 (UTC)

Corrected. 192.165.166.4 19:54, 21 February 2006 (UTC)

I did not write the article but the series diverges, it does #not# converge.


You also use the Dyson series in nonlinear physics (solution of Kramers-Moyal-Expansion). Perhaps anybody can add this to this category

The exponentiation of the "free" part is missing in the Tomonaga-Schwinger relation written here, both for the potential part and for the vector. 139.124.7.126 09:03, 18 July 2007 (UTC)