Dying Gaul
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The Dying Gaul (in Italian: Galata Morente) is an ancient Roman marble copy of a lost Hellenistic statue that is thought to have been executed in bronze, which was commissioned some time between 230 BC and 220 BC by Attalos I of Pergamon to honor his victory over the Celtic Galatians in Anatolia. The present base was added after its rediscovery. The identity of the sculptor is unknown, but it has been suggested that Epigonus, the court sculptor of the Attalid dynasty of Pergamon, may have been its author.
The statue depicts a dying Celt with remarkable realism, particularly in the face, and may have been painted.[1] He is represented as a Gallic warrior with a typically Gallic hairstyle and moustache. The figure is naked save for a neck torc. He is shown fighting against death, refusing to accept his fate.
Contents |
[edit] Portrayal of Celts
The statue serves both as a reminder of the Celts' defeat, thus demonstrating the might of the people who defeated them, and a memorial to their bravery as worthy adversaries. The statue may also provide evidence to corroborate ancient accounts of the Gallic fighting style - Diodorus Siculus reported that "Some [Gauls] use iron breast-plates in battle, while others fight naked, trusting only in the protection which nature gives.[1] Polybius wrote an evocative account of Gaulish tactics against a Roman army at the Battle of Telamon of 225 BC:
- "The Insubres and the Boii wore trousers and light cloaks, but the Gaesatae, in their love of glory and defiant spirit, had thrown off their garments and taken up their position in front of the whole army naked and wearing nothing but their arms... The appearance of these naked warriors was a terrifying spectacle, for they were all men of splendid physique and in the prime of life."[2]
Livy recorded that the Celts of Asia Minor fought naked and their wounds were plain to see on the whiteness of their bodies.[3] The Greek historian Dionysius of Halicarnassus regarded this as a foolish tactic: "Our enemies fight naked. What injury could their long hair, their fierce looks, their clashing arms do us? These are mere symbols of barbarian boastfulness."[4]
The depiction of this particular Gaul as naked may also have been intended to lend him the dignity of heroic nudity or pathetic nudity. It was not infrequent for Greek warriors to be likewise depicted as heroic nudes, as exemplified by the pedimental sculptures of the Temple of Aphaea at Aegina. The message conveyed by the sculpture, as H. W. Janson comments, is that "they knew how to die, barbarians that they were."[5]
[edit] Influence in art history
The Dying Gaul became one of the most celebrated works to have survived from antiquity and was endlessly copied and engraved by artists and sculptors. It is thought to have been rediscovered in the early 17th century during excavations for the foundations of the Villa Ludovisi and was first recorded in 1623 in the collections of the powerful Ludovisi family of Rome. It shows signs of having been repaired, with the head seemingly having been broken off at the neck, though it is unclear whether the repairs were carried out in Roman times or after the statue's 17th century rediscovery.[6]
The artistic quality and expressive pathos of the statue aroused great admiration among the educated classes in the 17th and 18th centuries and was a "must-see" sight on the Grand Tour of Europe undertaken by young men of the day. Byron was one such visitor, commemorating the Dying Gaul in his poem Childe Harold's Pilgrimage (canto 4, stanzas 140-141). It was widely copied, with kings, academics and wealthy landowners commissioning their own reproductions of the Dying Gaul (eg the black marble copy in the Robert Adam entrance hall of Syon House). The less well-off could purchase copies of the statue in miniature for use as ornaments and paperweights. More basic, full-size plaster copies were also studied by art students.
During this period, the statue was widely interpreted as representing a defeated gladiator, rather than a Gallic warrior. Hence it was known as the 'Dying' or 'Wounded Gladiator', 'Roman Gladiator', and 'Murmillo Dying'. It has also been called the 'Dying Trumpeter'. It was requisitioned by Napoleon Bonaparte by terms of the Treaty of Campoformio (1797) during his invasion of Italy and taken in triumph to Paris, where it was put on display. It was returned to Rome in 1815 and is currently on display in the Capitoline Museums.
[edit] Copies
Copies of the statue can be seen in the Museum of Classical Archaeology at Cambridge University, Leinster House in Dublin Ireland, as well as in Berlin, Prague and Stockholm. In the United states, copies are at the Washington State Historical Society in Tacoma, Washington and at the Redwood Library, Newport, Rhode Island.
The Royal Academy in London had one such copy, now at the Courtauld Gallery in London. It also had an écorché in this pose, cast in the late 18th century from the body of an executed smuggler and hence nicknamed "Smugglerius".
In the English market town of Brigg, the long established coaching inn The Dying Gladiator displays a copy, using the old title.
[edit] Notes
- ^ Diodorus in Stephen Allen (Author), Wayne Reynolds (Illustrator), Celtic Warrior: 300 BC - AD 100 (Osprey: 25 April 2001), ISBN 1841761435
- ^ Polybius, Histories II.28
- ^ Livy, History XXII.46 and XXXVIII.21
- ^ Dionysius of Halicarnassus, History of Rome XIV.9
- ^ H. W. Janson, "History of Art: A survey of the major visual arts from the dawn of history to the present day", p. 141. H. N. Abrams, 1977. ISBN 0133892964
- ^ Kim J. Hartswick, The Gardens of Sallust: a Changing Landscape, p. 107. University of Texas Press, 2004
[edit] References
- A Dictionary of Celtic Mythology. James McKillop. Oxford University Press, 1998
- Art in the Hellenistic Age, Pollitt, J. J., 1986
- The Bloomsbury Guide to Art, Ed. Shearer West. Bloomsbury Publishing Ltd, 1996
- Hellenistic Sculpture, Smith, R.R.R. London, 1991
- Taste and the Antique, Haskell, F. and N. Penny. New Haven and London, 1981. Cat. no. 44, pp 224ff.
- The Oxford Companion to Western Art. Ed. Hugh Brigstocke. Oxford University Press, 2001