User talk:Dwain

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Please note: Comments left by anonymous editors may be removed without warning. Please create an account or log in if you wish to engage in a meaningful discussion.

Welcome!

Peace in Christ!

Contents

[edit] Ross Petot

Hi, Pitchka. I took at good look at the article's history, and you're right, it shouldn't have been tagged as a speedy delete and I should've looked at it more closedly before deleting it. I gladly reinstated it and included a comment that it's no longer eligible for speedy deletion.

I'm sorry that you've been meeting with difficulty so far. It's really unfortunate, but many new users aren't treated with the respect they deserve, and I'm very sorry about that. Please know I'm always open if you have any questions or problems that you might need help with. Keep up the good work, and happy editing! – ClockworkSoul 01:55, 23 June 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Alessio Tramello

Hi! This article was tagged for notability and it caught my interest. As you would know, the guy was famous in his time and now becuse of his body of work. I added a bit of stuff and removed the tag but the article deserves some work. Someone who reads Italian could do a service on this one. I'm watching it with interest. Cheers! Stormbay 18:25, 8 July 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Francis Matthews

That was a good catch that they are one in the same Francis Matthews. I googled it to double check, and you are right. Well done! --Briancua 23:04, 2 August 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Carl A. Anderson

Hi Dwain. I note that you created Carl A. Anderson. Do you have any connection to the organisation? --WikiCats 14:32, 13 October 2006 (UTC)

If your are a good catholic man over 18 you would be eligible to be nominated.[1] If you have any interest in this organisation please email me. --WikiCats 22:12, 13 October 2006 (UTC)

Many are called, few are chosen. Pray about it. Email me.--WikiCats 00:24, 14 October 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Jimmy Fallon

I've reverted the article to what I believe is the better photograph. Thanks for coming to me for help, and please let me know if there are any further issues with this. - Brian Kendig 18:04, 22 January 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Our Sun day Visitor

The stub you wrote about this has been marked for speedy. There are people looking through the edits and foolishly deleting all stubs as not showing notability. I removed the tag as absurd, but it will surely be marked for deletion in a few hours or days unless you greatly expand it. There is quite a lot to say, as I am sure you know. -- Wish I had time to help more personally.DGG 00:34, 24 March 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Pro-Life Celebrities

Dwain, I thought you might like this list as it is going to be deleted!

This is a list of noted, or famous people that are against abortion and are of the Pro-Life ethic.

[edit] Democrazy (film)

I apologize for the long delay in responding to your request for help! If you still could use a hand, I'll take a close look at things soon. - Brian Kendig 03:18, 19 April 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Re [2]

With regards to your comments on Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Michael Legge (filmmaker) (third nomination): Please see Wikipedia's no personal attacks policy. Comment on content, not on contributors; personal attacks damage the community and deter users. Note that continued personal attacks may lead to blocks for disruption. Please stay cool and keep this in mind while editing. Thank you. John254 02:10, 21 April 2007 (UTC)

I assume you were referring to: "Boy R. you really love the "sound" of your own voice don't you? You're arguments are made up of pure speculation and outright lies. But don't let that stop you. We all know that you're nothing but a gameshow loser making yourself feel better by pontificating. Dwain" I would like to just say in my own defense that R._fiend has been accusing me of all sorts of things for years, he is a gameshow loser, having lost at Jeopardy! I was not referring to him as a "loser" as in, "you're a loser," but using the word appropriately for he lost during a gameshow and did not win; continuing onto another episode. The fact that he proudly proclaimed this at Wikipedia, I believe, is relevant. And if you ever take a look at his user pages and his other writings you will see that he does have a tendency to pontificate. I hardly think my comments very offensive; but if you feel I crossed the line then I do apologize. Dwain 15:40, 21 April 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Michael Smith, Jr.

Please don't re-add those claims about satanism and healing without reliable sources. Corvus cornix 20:42, 1 May 2007 (UTC)

I'm sorry, we wouldn't want to offend any lovable satanists out there. Dwain
Nor would we want to violate Wikipedia policies on proving claims. Corvus cornix 22:16, 1 May 2007 (UTC)


[edit] Barnaby Cabe

A {{prod}} template has been added to the article Barnaby Cabe, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice explains why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may contest the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. If you endorse deletion of the article, and you are the only person who has made substantial edits to the page, please tag it with {{db-author}}. •Jim62sch• 17:18, 22 July 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Vandalism

I've requested page protection at WP:RPP, hope it clears things up. (although you say you're a conservative...hey, anti-vandalism unites people!) —Ignatzmicetalkcontribs 13:27, 15 September 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Why would people find your profile offensive?

I may feel it shows a certain credulity (especially in detecting any trace of leadership, honesty, morality, etc. in George W. "whited sepulchre" Bush); but there is nothing which any sane person in a democratic republic should find offensive. I hope the vandals tire of you and go bother somebody else; I haven't been harassed for days now! --Orange Mike 23:28, 19 September 2007 (UTC) (took some of that reactionary Ben Stein's money once)

[edit] Is this Pitchka who started a page on Jose Lopez-Gaston?

I would like to talk to whoever started that article. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 74.141.163.185 (talk) 04:20, 9 October 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Solomon P. Sharp

I hope to further expand this article, as well as Jereboam O. Beauchamp in the coming weeks. If all goes well, I might even create a new article for the Beauchamp-Sharp Tragedy and try to make a featured topic out of all three together. If you're interested in helping, feel free.

BTW, your user page gets some serious vandalism, huh? Amazing. Believe it or not, there are some other conservative Wikipedians! Acdixon (talk • contribs • count) 21:13, 23 January 2008 (UTC)

That's interesting about Noah Beauchamp. If you can cite a source, you could mention the connection between the two in their respective articles. As for how to help on these articles, I usually start by adding any reliable sources I can find to the Further Reading section of each article, then start expanding the article from them, starting with the shortest source and going to the longest one. I'm almost finished expanding Solomon P. Sharp from the Cooke article; next I'll try to get my hands on a copy of the Bruce article and extract pertinent information about Sharp from it. Sharp's article will probably be ready for a GA nom by then. My cardinal rule is to cite everything as it's added; often when you're done, you end up with at least a GA-quality article. Only problem is no images of Beauchamp or Anna Cooke. If you run across any, please upload them. Acdixon (talk • contribs • count) 18:24, 24 January 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Sideshow Cinema

The article Sideshow Cinema which you worked extensively on sometime ago is up for deletion, I'd thought I'd let you know. Plank (talk) 16:38, 3 March 2008 (UTC)

[edit] WP:3rr Warning

Dwain, you are in violation of WP:3rr for your repeated reverts at Leonard Neale. If you continue you will be blocked. Please do not edit war. Blueboar (talk) 22:17, 27 March 2008 (UTC)

[edit] MfD nomination of User:Dwain/Republican Celebrities Page

User:Dwain/Republican Celebrities Page, a page you created, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Dwain/Republican Celebrities Page and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of User:Dwain/Republican Celebrities Page during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. Guy (Help!) 16:45, 17 April 2008 (UTC)

[edit] George Washington

Dwain,

I'm interested to see if any of these sources are accesable. Online would be perfect, an emailed PDF would be fine or if you can point to a library that would house these magazines in this period then that would be great.

JASpencer (talk) 06:55, 7 June 2008 (UTC)