Talk:Dungeons & Dragons: Dragonshard
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
 |
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Strategy games, an effort by several users to improve Wikipedia articles on strategy games. For more information, visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion. | |
| B | This article has been rated as B-Class on the assessment scale. | |
|
Strategy games To-do:
|
||
 |
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Video games. For more information, visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion. | |
| B | This article has been rated as B-Class on the assessment scale. | |
| Low | This article is on a subject of Low priority within gaming for inclusion in Wikipedia 1.0. | |
|
VG To-do:
|
||
I'm not sure if the bit about making warforged is really a continuity issue. There's a difference between the titans and regular humanoid warforged, mainly that the titans aren't living constructs like the other warforged. They're basically golems that are a bit more specialized to warfare than other varieties are. Is there anything from any of the Eberron books that says the non-living versions of the warforged were also prevented from ever being made again? I'm just not sure if their creation is necessarily tied inextricably to the same creation forges and processes that made the living warforged, making the titans impossible to create as well. Iron golems can still be built, after all. --Nerrin 03:04, 16 July 2006 (UTC)
[edit] criticism
That section doesn't really explain why reactions among the gaming community are mixed. I don't know too much about the criticism, all i've heard is that people think it's a woe clone or something, but there's got to be something more specific to say. (Hypersugarchild)
[edit] Full title
The full title of this game, according to MobyGames, is "Dungeons & Dragons: Dragonshard". Should the page be moved to reflect this? SharkD 04:54, 26 April 2007 (UTC)
