Talk:Dunedin Double EP
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
 |
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Albums, an attempt at building a useful resource on recordings from a variety of genres. If you would like to participate, visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion. |
| Stub | This article has been rated as Stub-class on the quality scale. |
| ??? | This article has not yet received a rating on the importance scale. |
|
The article has been rated for quality and/or importance but has no comments yet. If appropriate, please review the article and then leave comments here to identify the strengths and weaknesses of the article and what work it will need. |
|
 |
This article has been automatically rated as Stub-Class by WikiProject Albums because it uses a stub template.
|
[edit] Double EP, not EP
Please do not change the listing of this as a double EP. The record is in a very unusual format - two 12" discs, and at nearly 50 minutes is longer than many albums. To call it simply an EP is to misrepresent both its length and its format. Grutness...wha? 22:33, 25 September 2006 (UTC)
- Double EP is currently not a type supported by WP:ALBUM, thence it's put in the category: Non-standard album infoboxes and gets a peachpuff colour. Since the title already includes the "double ep" qualification, either EP Album or Box seems the most appropriate of the supported types.Spearhead 16:02, 4 October 2006 (UTC)
- Then it's about time it was recognised. I've spoken to other members of that WikiProject about this being a double EP in the past, and they've been happy enough to accept it as a separate type. And surely as an exncyclopedia we're meant to be accurate - giving this its correct (even if rare) status is far better than calling it something which it patently isn't. Grutness...wha? 03:27, 5 October 2006 (UTC)
- It's really a double EP compilation, so peach puff seems quite apt as non-standard format. ~ trialsanderrors 01:15, 10 November 2006 (UTC)
- Then it's about time it was recognised. I've spoken to other members of that WikiProject about this being a double EP in the past, and they've been happy enough to accept it as a separate type. And surely as an exncyclopedia we're meant to be accurate - giving this its correct (even if rare) status is far better than calling it something which it patently isn't. Grutness...wha? 03:27, 5 October 2006 (UTC)
