Talk:Duke of Loulé

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This article is poorly written and may be biased. There is no cohesive structure within the article and the tone seems to propound the Dukes of Loulē as legitimate as opposed to Duarte Pio who is recognized by most observers as the pretender to the Portuguese throne. Moreover, the writing style in this article is similar to that used in certain edits for and talk pages for the articles "Hilda Toledano" and "Duarte Pio," edits that were since reverted and corrected.

The article does need improvement in grammar and cohesion. But the above suggestion that the article is "biased" is not only unsourced speculation, but is anonymous, unsourced and itself biased. Worse, it makes little sense: Advocates for Hilda Toledano claim that she and her "heir" were Portugal's rightful pretenders, to the exclusion of both Duarte Pio, Duke of Braganza and the Dukes of Loulé. Lethiere 03:50, 13 November 2007 (UTC)