Talk:Dubris

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This article is within the scope of the Kent WikiProject, a collaborative effort to improve Wikipedia's coverage of topics related to the county of Kent in South East England.
If you would like to participate, you can visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks.
Start This article has been rated as start-Class on the assessment scale.
(If you rated the article please give a short summary at comments to explain the ratings and/or to identify the strengths and weaknesses of the article.)
Low This article is on a subject of low-importance for Kent-related articles.

Article Grading:
The article has been rated for quality and/or importance but has no comments yet. If appropriate, please review the article and then leave comments here to identify the strengths and weaknesses of the article and what work it will need.


plan of the stonehenge site This article is part of WikiProject Archaeology, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to archaeology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.
Start This article has been rated as start-Class on the assessment scale.
??? This article has not yet received an importance rating on the assessment scale.

[edit] Dubris - River Stour

The section below implies that Dover was situated on the estuary of the River Stour. However, the estuary of the River Stour is several miles north at Pegwell Bay. Should this be changed to the River Dour which flows through Dover?

"As the river estuary of the River Stour, Kent (now silted up) and the closest point to France, in Roman times the town became an important harbour of the Classis Britannica, an important fortified trading and cross-channel port and a starting point of Watling Street."

--Spagus 16:59, 25 March 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Merge with History of Dover

I am proposing this since there is great deal of duplication of facts. History of Dover has been lifted from the Dover article, and a resumé of that substituted in the parent article. Even so, much can be done to bring the history into some reasonable condition Peter Shearan (talk) 06:29, 11 February 2008 (UTC)

I would contest that. The topic can be dealt with in far more detail here, with a resumé on history of Dover. Merged onto history of Dover, it would overwhelm the rest of Dover's history. Other cities have separate pages for their Roman phase eg Durovernum Cantiacorum and Rutupiae. As for the duplication of facts, I'm editing it for that at the moment.Neddyseagoon - talk 10:23, 11 February 2008 (UTC)