Talk:Duane Reade

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

[edit] NPOV

I have nominated this article to be checked for its neutrality due to its disproportionally large "Criticism" section, which lacks citations. Furthermore, NPOV tags have been placed on this page in the past and removed without significant edits or any discussion.

Waphle 17:19, 7 February 2007 (UTC)

I removed the tag as unwarranted. The "citation needed" tags in the criticism section are sufficient, as the facts are correct. Ed Fitzgerald (unfutz) (talk/cont) 03:23, 7 August 2007 (UTC)

I have re-nominated this article for NPOV check -- it seems to me that any article that is almost entirely criticism and barely touches on its history at all cannot be a balanced article. There must be another side to all of this -- or, at least, something purely factual about the company and its history. ~~ Meeples (talk)(email) 17:47, 28 February 2008 (UTC)

Just a bit of a sarcastic comment: Real Editors don't use tags. (j/k ofc). Seriously tho, why take the time to hang up a "problem here" sign when it's about as easy to just fix the problem? Eaglizard (talk) 00:32, 25 March 2008 (UTC)