User talk:Dthem 2000

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Contents

[edit] License tagging for Image:Constance Hopkins.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Constance Hopkins.jpg. Wikipedia gets thousands of images uploaded every day, and in order to verify that the images can be legally used on Wikipedia, the source and copyright status must be indicated. Images need to have an image tag applied to the image description page indicating the copyright status of the image. This uniform and easy-to-understand method of indicating the license status allows potential re-users of the images to know what they are allowed to do with the images.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you need help on selecting a tag to use, or in adding the tag to the image description, feel free to post a message at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 10:05, 30 March 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Hugh de Stafford, 2nd Earl of Stafford

Guess we were editing at the same time Noles1984 14:36, 17 April 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Eberhard AKA Evrard

Looks like we have some common research... Care to merge?

(Sjcarpediem 06:47, 23 July 2007 (UTC))

[edit] you requested contact

Hello. (and next time, you shoudl use the discussion page, not the bio page. thnx.)

How can we help one another?

Sjcarpediem 18:02, 2 August 2007 (UTC)

[edit] awkward pause

The thing has already been done... Another wikipedian responded to my request for advice on the matter and handled the technicalities behind it. You are very welcome to invesigate the current article Eberhard of Friuli now redirects to Evrard (you can read the discussion page to learn the identity of the helpful wikipedian, or just above your own entry on my discussion page...).

Sjcarpediem 18:37, 3 August 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Sundehul

Hi, I noticed you have deleted the Rotrude of Trier-Charles Martel marriage based on ancestry error. I guess that must have been quite a mix-up there. I'm using the really helpful Foundation of Medieval Genealogy website for references, loads of information there. I'm trying to figure out whose woman was actually married to Charles and had issue from. I'm still trying to figure out whose parents were Rotrude's since the named Chrodobertus II is nowhere founded in the FMG site. Anyway, welcome back to the states (reading your bio). —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Sundehul (talk • contribs).

8.23.2007: Thank you for your message. I learned that The Royal Ancestry Bible Royal Ancestors of 300 Colonial American Families is not 100% reliable for all the information because the histories and timelines of these royal figures, especially the earliest ones, were sketchy or vague as it was put together from several genealogical sources made by other families who were descended from the royal figures and without corroborated historical sources from historians and researchers on the subject matters. The volumes are very helpful and informative, yes, but should be taken with a grain of salt. That's where the Foundation of Medieval Genealogy and the Peerage.com come in, the people behind these websites actually and thoroughly researched, corroborated, confirmed and compiled these royal and noble figures from long ago, as long as information said so or until new information from professional historians and scholars turn up to either confirm the information, contradict or reject it.

I am always looking out to make sure the right person was married to the right person and had issue with, even though information about them from so long ago is so sketchy or vague. Until then, all the historical information about these royal and noble figures we know now are all that we have.

Wanted to discuss more in depth via email instead of talk here? Let me know please. Regards, Sundehul

[edit] Richard fitzGilbert

Hi Don; how certain are you of the edit you made here[1]? I only ask, because Altschul, the best reference i have on the Clares, gives Richard's birthdate as 1035, and everything else i've seen, including the Foundation for Mediæval Genealogy and, i think, GEC, only say ante 1035. Is The Royal Ancestry... where it came from? Cheers, Lindsay 10:27, 4 September 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Bodegisel II

I am here based on your substantial edits to Arnulf of Metz‎. I have just put up Bodegisel II, (a poorly attested person connected with Arnulf), for deletion and would welcome anything you might add to the discussion. Thanks. Mdbrownmsw 15:06, 7 November 2007 (UTC)