User talk:Druge

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

An editor has expressed a concern that this user may be a sock puppet of Kclinden.
Please refer to editing habits and/or contributions; this policy subsection may also be helpful.

Account information: block log – current autoblocks – edits – logs

Please stop tagging articles as nonsense when they clearly do not meet the requirements of WP:CSD#G1. Thank-you. —  Tivedshambo  (t|c) 11:15, 10 March 2008 (UTC)

Please read WP:CSD before tagging articles with speedy deletes. --NeilN talk ♦ contribs 11:17, 10 March 2008 (UTC)

Only I fully understand the policy! Druge (talk) 11:17, 10 March 2008 (UTC)

March 2008

This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive edits.
The next time you vandalize Wikipedia, you will be blocked from editing. NeilN talk ♦ contribs 11:19, 10 March 2008 (UTC)

How fucking dare you accuse me of vandalism. Druge (talk) 11:20, 10 March 2008 (UTC)
You have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 week in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy for disruptive editing. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make constructive contributions. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest the block by adding the text {{unblock|your reason here}} below. FisherQueen (talk · contribs) 11:23, 10 March 2008 (UTC)

This blocked user (block log | autoblocks | rangeblocks | unblock | contribs | deleted contribs) has asked to be unblocked, but an administrator has reviewed and declined this request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy). Do not remove this unblock request while you are blocked.

Request reason: "Someone more intelligent than yourselves comes along and he gets blocked. This is just great. WORSHIP MY AWESOME GRASP OF THE NOTABILITY POLICY"

Decline reason: "Incivility and totally unconstructive additions. This block is preventative and within policy. — Pedro :  Chat  11:25, 10 March 2008 (UTC)"

Please make any further unblock requests by using the {{unblock}} template. However, abuse of the template may result in your talk page being protected.


This blocked user (block log | autoblocks | rangeblocks | unblock | contribs | deleted contribs) has asked to be unblocked, but an administrator has reviewed and declined this request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy). Do not remove this unblock request while you are blocked.

Request reason: "Incivility? Is it unPClike to declare you are more intelligent than another? If thats the case, then I am incivil. I hold PHD degrees in Molecular Biology, Modern French History, Medieval Papal history, Hydrological engineering, Education, being stuck up, the Wikipedia Notability policy. I believe I am superior in every fashion to every one of you, mainly because of my amazing grasp of the Wikipedia notability policy (Which really only requires one admin to delete an article he doesn't agree with) and you people are OK with this. Get a girlfriend, or a life, or both, because I've really enjoyed my little trolling spree here. See you this tomorrow folks!"

Decline reason: "Repeated vandalism, and repeated personal attacks, even in this unblock request make it clear that you are not interested in constructive contribution to the encyclopedia and are here simply to wind people up. Block extended to indefinite"

Please make any further unblock requests by using the {{unblock}} template. However, abuse of the template may result in your talk page being protected.

Based on your stated intention to continue disrupting Wikipedia, I've changed your block to an indefinite one. -FisherQueen (talk · contribs) 11:40, 10 March 2008 (UTC)