Talk:Drug dynamization

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This article was nominated for deletion on 2007-03-07. The result of the discussion was keep.

This article is within the scope of the Homeopathy WikiProject, a collaborative effort to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Homeopathy. If you would like to participate, you can visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks.

I'm sorry, but this article, as it currently stands, is awful. It's full of unexplained jargon, lacks focus, leaps off into tangents - e.g. "It can be viewed at the Hahnemann Museum in Stuttgart." before actually explaining the main points (e.g. what is succussion supposed to be doing?) It needs a LOT of work before it's anywhere near reasonable. Adam Cuerden ^talk 02:10, 18 July 2007 (UTC)

Yes, and if you look in this family of articles and do some web searching, you will find there is NO Hahnemann Museum in Stuttgart. There is another medical museum that includes a Hahnemann section. It is this kind of inaccuracy and vagueness of statements, all the way through this family of articles that makes them so irritating to edit. Everything has to be checked and rechecked, because most of what is written is either nonsense, or subtly distorted, or just plain wrong. And some of it is not even English.--Filll 13:31, 18 July 2007 (UTC)

Well get on with it then! you said the other day you would revise the core article and come to work on these later in due course, so why the sudden change of heart? I do not welcome adam cuerden back as he is the main architect of the mess you noted, so you either get on with this task or forget and I will leave it too. who cares? Peter morrell 13:55, 18 July 2007 (UTC)

I am doing what I can, off and on. I have the 2nd greatest number of edits overall in 5.5 years of all editors on homeopathy alone (second only to TimVickers, who I am rapidly catching up with and who has more than a year worth of editing). And that does not count all the edits on related articles that I have made. I want to fix the History of homeopathy article. But it gets quite tedious, especially when we have to build concensus. I am sure you can tell from all the contrary opinions that this is difficult to do. Many of these people like Orangemarlin and Adam and Jim are people that I have worked with for months. We have been productive together and pretty much respect each other and try to cooperate if we can, even if we might disagree on some issues.--Filll 17:22, 18 July 2007 (UTC)