User talk:Drstuey/Archive2005

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Contents 1 RfC against Everyking 2 "30+" candidates 3 Reference Removal 4 Image:KeithLockeMP.jpg has been listed for deletion

[edit] RfC against Everyking

Hi, I noticed you were at one point involved in the dispute at Autobiography (album). Well, I've filed an RfC against Everyking, and I thought you might like to certify or at least endorse it. Thanks. Johnleemk | Talk 05:42, 9 Jan 2005 (UTC)

I've filed an arbitration request against Everyking. Please comment; brickbats for my foolhardiness are more than welcome. Johnleemk | Talk 07:54, 16 Jan 2005 (UTC)

Some of us feel that the proposed decision against Everyking is insufficient and too weak for a user who has abused Wikipedia so badly. I hope you can weigh in at Wikipedia talk:Requests for arbitration/Everyking/Proposed decision having read the proposed decision and discussion and share your opinion with us, whether it's that the decision is too strong, just right, or too weak. Johnleemk | Talk 06:09, 21 Jan 2005 (UTC)

[edit] "30+" candidates

Hi. I notice you've just re-added all the "30+" notes that I previously took out. That's fine, but could you clarify my understanding of what "30+" means? As far as I know, it isn't a valid ranking for a list actually given to the Electoral Commission. Will the candidates be omitted from the list? Will they simply be listed alphabetically? Or is the exact ranking still to be determined? Whichever the case, I think that their actual ranking on the actual submitted list is more desirable than "30+", even if that's how the party sees it. After all, it's the actual list which would determine seats. -- Vardion 19:47, 25 May 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Reference Removal

I noticed you removed the reference at Gilbert Hernandez. At Wikipedia:Cite sources/example style the following guidance is given:

Because the Web is dynamic, it is possible that a web page used as a reference may become inactive. Do not remove such inactive references—even inactive, they still record the sources that were used. Make a note of the date that the original link was found to be inactive. If an Internet Archive copy of the page is known, add a link to that.

Therefore I have re-instated the reference. Steve block talk 08:11, 17 August 2005 (UTC)

In actual fact the reference link is still active. Steve block talk 08:16, 17 August 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Image:KeithLockeMP.jpg has been listed for deletion

An image or media file that you uploaded, Image:KeithLockeMP.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please look there to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you.