Talk:Driving pleasure

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Cars Portal
This article is within the scope of Wikipedia Project Automobiles, a collective approach to creating a comprehensive guide to the world of automobiles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you are encouraged to visit the project page, where you can contribute to the discussion.
Stub This article has been rated as Stub-Class on the Project's quality scale.
??? This article has not yet been assigned a rating on the importance scale.
This article has been automatically assessed as Stub-Class by WikiProject Automobiles because it uses a stub template.
  • If you agree with the assessment, please remove {{WikiProject Automobiles}}'s auto=yes parameter from this talk page.
  • If you disagree with the assessment, please change it by editing the class parameter of the {{WikiProject Automobiles}} template, removing {{WikiProject Automobiles}}'s auto=yes parameter from this talk page, and removing the stub template from the article.
Articles for deletion This article was nominated for deletion in the past. The result of the discussion was keep.

[edit] hang on

this article is badly missed in wikipedia. if its nonsense it will become sense in few edits. dont be in hurry, wikipedia takes time for any article to make sense. Vinay412 04:27, 3 May 2007 (UTC)

but point is this article is very much necessary in wikipedia. content will be improved later.202.41.72.100 06:58, 3 May 2007 (UTC)

    • I don't understand how it's necessary. JuJube 06:59, 3 May 2007 (UTC)

driving pleasure is mostly used in any review of any car. but this term should be defined or explained in wiki. hence it is necessary. thanksVinay412 07:11, 3 May 2007 (UTC)

  • Please do try to find proper sources then, and damn quick. Currently I don't see a need for this, and right now this article is extremely bad. Not properly wikified, original research, no sources at all - improve quickly, or at least make it into an NPOV stub. -The preceding signed comment was added by Nazgjunk (talk • contrib) 07:33, 3 May 2007 (UTC)

why should i alone do it all to save the page? it is useful not just to me. i wrote all i know and delete content which do not seem correct, but not the article itself. try improving instead of advising this and that. thanks Vinay412 07:59, 3 May 2007 (UTC)

    • Vinay412, please add at least one reference that supports what you've written here. By adding this article, you believe it to be a notable topic that should be included in Wikipedia. This means that you know the term to be widely used more or less as you've defined it. Please give at least one of your references. --SueHay 13:08, 3 May 2007 (UTC)

sorry i couldnt find any references. i'm done with this article. to be frank i'm fed up of these reference and copyright issues. half knowledge is risk, cheers202.41.72.100 03:51, 4 May 2007 (UTC)