Talk:Driving Van Trailer
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
 |
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Trains, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to rail transport on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion. See also: WikiProject Trains to do list |
||
| Start | This article has been rated as start-Class on the quality scale. (assessment comments) | ||
| Low | This article has been rated as low-importance within the Trains WikiProject. | ||
 |
This article is within the scope of WikiProject UK Railways.
|
||
 |
This article is within the scope of the Passenger trains task force. |
Er, looking at the Mark 3 DVT list, where is the EWS executive one? It definately a Mark 3 DVT... User:Tom walker 20:35 GMT August 30 2006
[edit] 101 Sqadron
Surely this DVT has been de-named as a pendolino now carries the same name?
[edit] Split
I've proposed this be split to make a clear distinction between the two variants and would welcome any comments on this. The arrangement I am suggesting would include a page at this title describing the aspects common to both with links to the two types. Adambro (talk) 20:05, 20 January 2008 (UTC)
- Seems an entirely logical suggestion to me as the various types of Mk3 & Mk4 coaches have their own pages, it's just weather you want to put the effort in Oxyman42 (talk) 02:36, 27 January 2008 (UTC)
Oppose Split and Remove vehicle numbers The article refers to DVT (Driving Van Trailer), as in the code used to describe the rail vehicle. There are no seperate sections for BSO, or FK vehicles of any variant. Also, the inclusion of the individual vehicle details reads like a Rail Enthusiasts number book, and is not relevent in an encyclopedia. Removing that would go to make the page much more readable.--81.159.10.178 (talk) 14:08, 30 January 2008 (UTC)
Oppose I can see why you suggest it, but I would suggest individual info on each type should be in the Mk3 and Mk4 pages and this article be more about what a DVT actually is Talltim (talk) 17:11, 22 February 2008 (UTC)
